4 ms·

That was one blogger and a handful of commenters on 4chan, by your own admission. Could you edit your comment to remove the word "everyone" since that is clearl

by yucky 4y ago

That was one blogger and a handful of commenters on 4chan, by your own admission. Could you edit your comment to remove the word "everyone" since that is clearly not accurate? The Hunter Biden story is, and has always been, about him selling access to his father to Ukrainian powerbrokers so that what we're seeing unfold now over there would be possible. His claims to be saving "10% for the Big Guy" clearly allude to money being kicked back to his dad the Vice President at the time, and current man in charge of delivering billions of dollars to those same powerbrokers in Ukraine now. This is what the investigation is about. Nobody cares if Hunter was a drug addict or a douchebag it's always been about the above.

Sightline 4y ago
No I'm not changing my comment. I get the feeling you'd shift the goalposts no matter how much proof I show. Posted today: https://twitter.com/JoanneRansing/status/1598963377984135183 https://twitter.com/JoanneRansing/status/1598963377984135183 "Hunter Biden had sex with his niece Natalie. His dead brother's underage daughter - he was also banging her Mom. Will they manage to keep this video secret forever? Lots of people have seen it including me." https://twitter.com/kuckieman/status/1598895748636372992 https://twitter.com/kuckieman/status/1598895748636372992 "One question, Are you ok with the pictures of Hunter Biden and clearly underage girls? You and Hunter are the problem." https://twitter.com/wokeantag0nist/status/1599015273809735680 https://twitter.com/wokeantag0nist/status/159901527380973568... "Hunter had sex with underage girls and used his dad to broker deals against America’s best interest, “ what’s the big heal lolz” congratulations you’re dumb and pathetic enough to be Biden’s next diversity hire"
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
- tomrod 4y ago
  None of these are proof? Or is truth whatever a Twitter mob decides it to be?
- yucky 4y ago
  I don't understand what random tweets from nobodies have to do with what we're discussing.
  - Sightline 4y ago
    You: "The Hunter Biden story is, and has always been, about him selling access to his father to Ukrainian powerbrokers" Me: shows credible proof demonstrating that's not the case You: feigns confusion Why are you playing dumb?, sure seems like you get "confused" a lot.
    - yucky 4y ago
      Credible proof to you = random twits from nobodies? Well, I think we've identified the issue. Please don't look up flat earth tweets, it will break you heart.

by yucky 4y ago

Sightline 4y ago

No I'm not changing my comment. I get the feeling you'd shift the goalposts no matter how much proof I show. Posted today: https://twitter.com/JoanneRansing/status/1598963377984135183 https://twitter.com/JoanneRansing/status/1598963377984135183 "Hunter Biden had sex with his niece Natalie. His dead brother's underage daughter - he was also banging her Mom. Will they manage to keep this video secret forever? Lots of people have seen it including me." https://twitter.com/kuckieman/status/1598895748636372992 https://twitter.com/kuckieman/status/1598895748636372992 "One question, Are you ok with the pictures of Hunter Biden and clearly underage girls? You and Hunter are the problem." https://twitter.com/wokeantag0nist/status/1599015273809735680 https://twitter.com/wokeantag0nist/status/159901527380973568... "Hunter had sex with underage girls and used his dad to broker deals against America’s best interest, “ what’s the big heal lolz” congratulations you’re dumb and pathetic enough to be Biden’s next diversity hire"

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
tomrod 4y ago
None of these are proof? Or is truth whatever a Twitter mob decides it to be?
yucky 4y ago
I don't understand what random tweets from nobodies have to do with what we're discussing.
- Sightline 4y ago
  You: "The Hunter Biden story is, and has always been, about him selling access to his father to Ukrainian powerbrokers" Me: shows credible proof demonstrating that's not the case You: feigns confusion Why are you playing dumb?, sure seems like you get "confused" a lot.
  - yucky 4y ago
    Credible proof to you = random twits from nobodies? Well, I think we've identified the issue. Please don't look up flat earth tweets, it will break you heart.