yters

48 ms·

481.
by yters 6y ago
why would the rcmp want a random gunman to kill 20 innocent civilians? methinks the author is too quick to jump to gov conspiracy
482.
by yters 6y ago
an anecdote from one mountie without any reference to official procedures is solid evidence?
483.
by yters 6y ago
he withdrew a huge amount of money, and the press cant prove the secret service didnt pay him i guess secret service are guilty till proven innocent...
484.
Can AI restore blurred images?(mindmatters.ai)
2 points by yters 6y ago|0 comments
485.
by yters 6y ago
Check out Darwin's "Descent of Man".
486.
Will AI or Fighter Pilots Win the 2021 Dogfight? Or Both?(mindmatters.ai)
1 points by yters 6y ago|0 comments
487.
by yters 6y ago
I think my mind did better with abstract thought before puberty.
488.
by yters 6y ago
probably depends if you are applying to another faang or if you want to work on mission critical insurance technology people who really need skills are probably good at indentifying said skills
489.
by yters 6y ago
Don't a large portion of IT projects fail?
490.
by yters 6y ago
what about human augmented ai? that is what successful ai companies use
491.
by yters 6y ago
It's funny that mainstream now means what most people don't care about.
492.
by yters 6y ago
Both explanations can be true at the same time.
493.
by yters 6y ago
A university's selling point to an employer is their degree ensures a student knows the material and can reason about it. That is the practical point of academic ethics. If a student cheats, sure they may get a decent job, although t
494.
by yters 6y ago
From the article: "The NIH established a framework for determining how the research would go forward: scientists have to get approval from a panel of experts, who would decide whether the risks were justified. The reviews were indeed c
495.
by yters 6y ago
What do you see and feel during a bad trip?
496.
by yters 6y ago
could maybe bootstrap, each subsequent race gets more complex dna and capability
497.
by yters 6y ago
I think the implication of the article is that Fauci likely was aware of this research since he promoted such studies, and it was approved by a secret panel at the NIH, along with him being the head of the organization that funded the resea
498.
by yters 6y ago
What is going on with your account, everything you post is dead? Yes, I see that the WIV associated researcher Shi Zheng-Li just provided the genetic materials, and the experiment itself was carried out by Baric. I don't believe the la
499.
by yters 6y ago
For some reason your most recent comment is dead, and I cannot reply to it, so I'll reply here. It looks like the funding did cover the WIV research, from what I understand the article to say. "The NIH research consisted of two pa
500.
by yters 6y ago
If books can only be created by human free will, and evolution does not have free will, then that implies DNA must have been generated by something like a human. Aliens?
501.
by yters 6y ago
Yes, I saw that. But he doesn't seem to have been front and center like he is with the current pandemic. I chalk that up to the remarkable fact he was able to predict both the vector and location with his funding prior to the outbrea
502.
by yters 6y ago
From the newsweek article I posted in the parent comment. https://www.newsweek.com/dr-fauci-backed-controversial-wuhan... Fauci is not personally conducting gain of function research, but he is both funding and promoting su
503.
by yters 6y ago
The author has a couple arguments, some stronger than others. The argument that changing constraints dramatically change system function, and thus enable top down control, is good. It is why we can program computers without being quantum p
504.
by yters 6y ago
Yes, and I haven't seen him show up in previous epidemics like swine flu, so I made the connection that his recent gain of function funding might have given him special insight for this particular pandemic. I'm trying to make sens
505.
by yters 6y ago
If I blur my eyes and read fast, it is not so hard to understand, i.e. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typoglycemia .
506.
by yters 6y ago
That's a very good point. So it is that Dr. Fauci anticipated the outbreak, and that is why he is advising the president.
507.
by yters 6y ago
Yes and no. Yes, a major from my many years in academia is sophistication is valued over simplicity. A bunch of fancy symbols and equations = important, so much of what is published appears, at least to me, to be much more complicated than
508.
by yters 6y ago
It's weird that no one mentions Fauci was funding and promoting bat to human coronavirus research in Wuhan in 2019. https://www.newsweek.com/dr-fauci-backed-controversial-wuhan... Is it just a coincidence? Additionally
509.
by yters 6y ago
The CDC reports covid-19 lethality is most likely 0.4%. For comparison, the flu each season has a lethality around 0.13%. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/index.html
510.
CDC: Low Covid-19 Lethality(cdc.gov)
1 points by yters 6y ago|1 comments

More ›