ysofunny

28 ms·

451.
by ysofunny 3y ago
My own take on [0] is that is way too focused on the technical aspects of the problems but most of these problems aren't technical in nature. no amount of 'tech hacking' can solve what are ultimately political (socioeconomic)
452.
by ysofunny 3y ago
you offhandedly diminish the power of convenicence
453.
by ysofunny 3y ago
not quite, some advertisement is all about visibility, about knowing what's out there so that (in theory) you may proceed to purchase it
454.
by ysofunny 3y ago
The most poetic part is how the train maker are merely looking out for their own profit margins..... Economic theory(?) would suggest that if they don't do this, their competition eats their lunch and drives them out of business. heck,
455.
by ysofunny 3y ago
.... just imagine how many instructions you can hide in a 64-bit address space (I'm thinking of you intel hacker magic)
456.
by ysofunny 3y ago
but now explain this in "Legaleeze" to Apple, to Nintendo, etc....
457.
by ysofunny 3y ago
"if everybody is being spied on, nobody is being spied on" ???
458.
by ysofunny 3y ago
the worst think about Java (in general, Jenkins is Java) is that it solves a real problem that companies have. I put, however, that only companies have the problem, not programmers, and not even regular (sized) engineering teams; except w
459.
by ysofunny 3y ago
nonetheless your government can force your ISP to do so many things
460.
by ysofunny 3y ago
> Expiration of money and inflation can exist simultaneously. yes, but we are also expected to pay: rent, taxes, and subscription (utility) services simultaneously
461.
by ysofunny 3y ago
maybe the only real technical problem is "whose is that?"