5 ms·
My own take on [0] is that is way too focused on the technical aspects of the problems but most of these problems aren't technical in nature. no amount of 'te
by ysofunny 3y ago
My own take on [0] is that is way too focused on the technical aspects of the problems
but most of these problems aren't technical in nature.
no amount of 'tech hacking' can solve what are ultimately political (socioeconomic) issues.
these are matters of government policy and such. the law is not about the words used to write it down with, but about the principlies behind, about the intents of the people who wrote it; regardless of who is reading.
but I also consider that "law making" and computing are ultimately solving a very similar problem so do feel free to dismiss what I say
- adolph 3y agoSivers and Doctorow discuss different problem-solution pairs. Are the problems posed by Doctorow not technically solvable? Primary Automobile diagnostic codes: Doctorow's hypothetical tech solution already exists in OpenPilot. This is due to a technical standard, CAN bus[0]. The CAN is is easier to access with the government mandate of an ODB connector[1] but that wasn't necessary, just helpful. 0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAN_bus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAN_bus 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On-board_diagnostics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On-board_diagnostics