Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ysleepy
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
47 ms
·
481.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
Java only has single dynamic dispatch. That means it will use the method of the most specific sub-class, but will not dispatch on the runtime type of the argument, only its compile time type. So something like: for(None n: expreTree.chi
482.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
Pretty cheap if it ends up saving the Android ecosystem. Android is maybe using 10% of the functionality in the linux kernel but is paying all the overhead and friction of maintaining a branch for each and every device. I think google wants
483.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
Some context relating to Intel: "We saw some really bad Intel CPU bugs in 2015, and we should expect to see more in the future" https://danluu.com/cpu-bugs/ https://news.ycombinator.com/item?i
484.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
While I really like these sort of file systems, I'm not holding my breath. This isn't a simple filesystem project, but plays in the next-gen space ZFS opened up. There will be a lot to do, especially IO scheduling, RAID safety wit
485.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
(?) Obviously, but building a bit-by-bit identical compiler output is moderately hard.
486.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
I don't get it. This would not increase trust since we can not check if the source actually corresponds to the binary in the processor. It would need to be repeatably build-able with the result matching the signature of the default blo
487.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
There are multiple paragraphs on it just above the Leibniz section (ctrl+f infinit). It comes down to, yes infinity (or any permutation (or DAG) of the universe of facts) for some facts. And yes that is not very satisfying. - But I think an
488.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
There is a secret OS running inside the CPU that you don't have access to. Only Intel/AMD know whats really inside and it has access to everything in your system. Usually it even interjects itself into the LAN controller listening
489.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
Yeah nice try Oracle, MySQL will not gain its community traction back.
490.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
That is wonderful. I always dread dealing with build systems, mostly in the C land. Deterministic behaviour, especially in this rigorous fashion, is probably very helpful for much more cases than just trust. This looming assumption that mak
491.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
So I assume this means cockroachDB currently (probably) meets its promised consistency levels. How does it compare to the usual default settings of PostgreSQL for example? - I think you get SERIALIZABLE, so the behaviour should be very reas
492.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
Also the "surface" the community sees is not very inviting. Bugzilla is horrible to use, browsing it gives you the strong impression it is abandoned. The wiki is also always outdated, or you can't tell. The forums are a nice
493.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
Java does not give memory back to the system very quickly per default. This blows up the memory allocated to the jvm considerably. start it with: java -XX:+UseG1GC -XX:MinHeapFreeRatio=5 -XX:MaxHeapFreeRatio=15 -jar ... and the jvm
494.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
I have a NUC5i3RYH and you can (I have) set the fan control curve in the bios so that the fan stays off until the CPU reaches 75°C. It is completely silent until you do some gpu/cpu intensive stuff for some time. It is a lot better tha
495.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
Well, what happens if you break the signature? - the IME does not start up... - Exactly what we wanted.
496.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
Interesting. In light of recent Oracle JavaSE licencing enforcement (MissionControl etc.) this will provide some safety from legal uncertainty. And maybe redHat will also release a JDK6 build for Windows for the poor souls ( cough ) who are
497.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
Well defining the java GC as tracing is underspecifying it a bit. Virtually all GCs are non-refcount, AFAIK mostly because touching refcounters all the time destroys memory performance. A tracing GC can do that in a batched and parallel fas
498.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
I'm interested in how this was fixed. Is the update an EFI update which disables DMA or does it with IOMMU? Or is the memory just overwritten on boot? I'm also quite surprised they leave the password in memory in multiple location
499.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
typo "distrobution" in the article.
500.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
Same happens with Chrome, when I side-load my own chrome extension. It's really annoying. I assume they just copied this behavior.
501.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
I read the article, and the quoted sentence. This is the reason why I find your HN submission title intentionally misleading. It's a cool project, and this deception is entirely unnecessary. Why not claim "FASTER than Dokany"
502.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
Super misleading title and benchmark. Why did they not use a RAM Drive for the NTFS test like one of these https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_RAM_drive_software#Non... Are there any on-disk filesystem implementation
503.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
Sure they are related. But its not black and white, and not an absolute correlation. macOS itself is actually designed in a very modular way if you look at the message based integration of components via XPC and "do one thing" dae
504.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
The UI is polished, Commercial and refined Apps are available and technological it is a reasonably sound design. I have my *nix shell with software from macports as well. I just don't have the motivation or time anymore to make linux f
505.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
Ah, I'm holding it wrong. :P I use FreeBSD, Linux and Windows. I like macOS, I want to use it, but not under a facist rule of the one holy way. It is a tool and should not push policy through arbitrary limitations. But it seems we are
506.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
Nice resource. But what I miss most, is a deeper analysis of the different launchd services and agents. - Especially which ones can be disabled and what features will be impacted. It is quite opaque, especially considering the verbose descr
507.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
SQL Server TDS spec was published in 2008, when jTDS was in version 1.2 and already feature complete and stable.
508.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
Yeah, maybe we'll switch as well now. But I just cant stand the loving hype for MS here. They gave out such horrible and dog slow drivers to their paying customers that people reverse engineered the protocol and wrote their own. And it
509.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
Yay... Isnt everyone using jTDS anyway because it is reliably faster? https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/36e7b9cf-5bc5... http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7848213/why-is-jt
510.
▲
by
ysleepy
10y ago
Seems like a good time for the technical community to reassess its contribution to the situation and how we can do better. How were communication services used by individuals and the state? Did the threat model encompass the seen actions an
More ›