ysavir

57 ms·

571.
by ysavir 6y ago
Real life. Most of what we do online is something we can do offline locally as well, but we've moved to an online version because of the short-term conveniences. But as the long-term consequences begin to show, there's nothing pre
572.
by ysavir 6y ago
The alternative is what most people don't want to accept: That we should become less dependent on the web.
573.
by ysavir 6y ago
> in this case FB is fighting for the consumer to get all the money, which is a fight worth having regardless of what the cynic might say Sure, but that's not quite their goal. No doubt that the "Paid Online Events" featur
574.
by ysavir 6y ago
This blog posts describes the conflict as "providing value to other developers" vs "providing value to users", but that's false dichotomy. Refactoring isn't about providing value to other developers, it's
575.
by ysavir 6y ago
Balance also is not quite the correct thing to strive for. The proper course of action is to work with the leadership to figure out when the expected critical points are for the business. This includes fund raising, IPOs, acquisition, or an
576.
by ysavir 6y ago
Would the 2020 census help alleviate the problem in this particular election cycle, since it's so chronologically close?
577.
by ysavir 6y ago
I think the "ship asap" is necessary for brand new startups. If you can't generate the user growth necessary to secure the next round of funding you'll be out of business, and that time spent writing the ideal code was
578.
by ysavir 6y ago
> The status update aspect of it could be automatized from the task management tooling, people reach out for help/input as needed and don't wait for the next stand up, socialize outside of these allocated slots, etc. People rar
579.
by ysavir 6y ago
I make my pancakes with oat flour, no sugar (other than the chocolate chips--can't give those up), and no dairy. The chips are at least 62% cocoa, so their sugar levels aren't as high as milk chocolate chips. I just checked and th
580.
by ysavir 6y ago
This is fantastic and I'll be giving a try. Do you think the recipe/process works fine if I scale it down to a 1-cup yield?
581.
by ysavir 6y ago
Thanks! I'll definitely keep an eye out for it. Now if only they can make a 16oz product for those us of who don't use it enough to consume 32oz in 7-10 days...
582.
by ysavir 6y ago
> The author engages in a little deceptive rhetoric himself by setting a 12oz serving as the baseline. It's true that a portion that size is bad for you. Lattes are bad for you. Like many people, though, I only rarely use milk subst
583.
by ysavir 6y ago
Looks like we're both not entirely correct (and probably both skipped the security blog posts!). In the security blog post, they explicitly say "An origin will be cleared if it [...] is classified as a tracker in our Tracking Prot
584.
by ysavir 6y ago
I think it means that 3rd party cookies will be deleted in 24 hours unless you visited the site of origin in the last 45 days. So if you get a 3rd party cookie from www.marketingsite.com, but never visited that site, it will be deleted in 2
585.
by ysavir 6y ago
Can you expand on your opinion? Do you consider all instances of binding data and code dangerous?
586.
by ysavir 6y ago
> They could very easily make a policy that is difficult for google to enforce, and completely impossible for a smaller player to even contemplate. You can't fight fire with fire and you can't fight scale with scale. The soluti
587.
by ysavir 6y ago
It's great because Ruby is an Object-Oriented Programming language. Just saying that is an understatement; Ruby lives and breathes Object Oriented philosophies. It was made for them. The conflict here is that object oriented philosop
588.
by ysavir 6y ago
> I created this repo for myself and did not expect it to blow up like this. Hah! In that case, congratulations on the unexpected success. Great initiative and I hope to see this project again in the future.
589.
by ysavir 6y ago
> Americans, along with the British and the French, seems to be the groups that most people complained about when it comes to groups vacationing in Europe. Citizens might complain due to the personal habits and practices of individual to
590.
by ysavir 6y ago
> You're also conflating different problems here. If someone is writing poor SQL it doesn't matter if their deploying with a VM, Docker, or onto a bare metal server. They are related, as devs sometimes think of microservices as
591.
by ysavir 6y ago
> That's why we have early adopters to bring it to a more universally accepted state :-) Who are the early adopters? People that want to have their profile featured, or people hoping to find inspiration? > This project is quite i
592.
by ysavir 6y ago
So another words, if the projects progresses (far) beyond it's current state, it will be worth of note. I agree! But I disagree that accepting everything is the best path to get there. As it is, it's burned away any interest I hav
593.
by ysavir 6y ago
The integrity of this being a project to "collect awesome readmes" is somewhat undone by people adding their own readme. It's made worse as it seems each submission is accepted as long as it meets formatting criteria, without
594.
by ysavir 6y ago
As a thought experiment, do you have the same reaction when considering visiting a new restaurant in person?
595.
by ysavir 6y ago
>I'd say that believing experts is more an act of philosophy than an act of science. Not philosophy. Faith.
596.
by ysavir 6y ago
I'm currently working on something just like this. https://www.mynexus.io (It's 95% ready but still a WIP, so excuse any clunkiness and the lack of content) It's a content aggregator for content creators (plus cus
597.
by ysavir 6y ago
Not the GP, but I figure their point is as follows: If I'm running an e-commerce website, I don't mind pay-per-search since those searches may turn into sales, so the cost is justified. My income scales with search count, and the
598.
by ysavir 6y ago
Why are you afraid of downvotes? There's little reason to self-censor due to an internet currency. And I wouldn't say the forum is "exactly this" unless you're saying that downvotes are on par with getting "fir
599.
by ysavir 6y ago
The problem is cost of entry into the market with diminishing returns. What we have is not a technology problem. The problem is that what you build is worthless unless you get people to adopt it. And right now, that requires: * Building a p
600.
by ysavir 6y ago
> The mission is NOT "get as much donation money as possible" No, it's not, but it should go without saying that accomplishing the mission includes keeping Wikipedia alive and functioning. It would hardly be accomplished i

More ›