yrb

8 ms·

31.
by yrb 17y ago
I pretty much agree completely. The place it normally gets interesting with this approach is where exactly do you put the demark, especially in the FTTN world. Since you are going to most likely want the public utility to own the DSLAMs in
32.
by yrb 17y ago
Except I am not sure it is destined to become a commodity in the near future because of the sky high capital expenditure required to roll out most forms of infrastructure in most places.
33.
by yrb 17y ago
Things just really don't work on human time/relationship scales anymore, especially when it comes to internet services. Communications can move in milliseconds now, diagnosing and fixing complex issues is still on the order of hours/years/l
34.
by yrb 17y ago
;) How many "innocent" hurried changes have you seen blow up in production. I agree with what your saying, just don't know how applicable it is to the class of software we are discussing.
35.
by yrb 17y ago
It would appear to me if you ever hit the failure mode of needing a C++ programmer within the hour, to fix a completely unknown codebase. It very much seems to me like you have already lost. As far as I have seen the verification and testin
36.
by yrb 17y ago
While both represent walled gardens. One by search ranking the other by latency/bandwidth. It is a lot easier to change/create a search provider since there is nothing that has locked you in as such. But remember you are there because you f
37.
by yrb 17y ago
I am not sure how regulation is really going to help anyone except the black hat SEOs. If anything it will just make things worse by slowing down the ability of google to respond to black hat SEO and creating a more bureaucratic form of who