yqtjnvou

11 ms·

1.
by yqtjnvou 2y ago
If you know something that another does not, you should teach him. Otherwise, he will never learn any better. And if he doesn't learn any better, he will continue to spread its misinformation everywhere he goes. Ignoring him will not
2.
by yqtjnvou 2y ago
I focus on real problems and not the ones that bring the most income - the latter is politics, which is why I don't dabble in it. Politics was created as a distraction for the population, the idea that someone listens to them, and figh
3.
by yqtjnvou 2y ago
It's much better to post imbecilities than to be moderated. Moderation is biased, unmoderated is not. You need to pick your poison. I like everything pure. Stupidity is part of life; if the people are stupid, then we have a duty to tea
4.
by yqtjnvou 2y ago
My definition is the ability to show a situation for what it is. Now tell me, is this correct, according to its definition?
5.
by yqtjnvou 2y ago
To describe a situation as-is. Not taking sides. Because the population is getting stupider by the day (their doing) and it's being programmed. I don't like a re-programmed populations.
6.
by yqtjnvou 2y ago
All of them. This is the purpose of this thread. I use their moderators to see exactly what their rules are. Long-posts, depicting the situation as-is, no derogatory terms, and all get removed within 1h after posting.
7.
by yqtjnvou 2y ago
I wish you good luck in your endeavor. You shouldn't give any details because they are all watching (and waiting). And be careful of your friends (and not enemies).
8.
by yqtjnvou 2y ago
I am concerned about another problem: To justify their existence, search engines cannot simply ignore certain websites, but what they do is to make them harder to find. There many techniques for this. The average person is not aware of this
9.
by yqtjnvou 2y ago
I know. That's the point of my question: what is a place completely unmoderated? Everywhere that allows free speech now has an angle. Some hide it better than others, and people can't see it.
10.
by yqtjnvou 2y ago
> So I'm not sure if they're saying that isn't what X is doing, or that they're criticising X for not going beyond the law (illegally), or that perhaps they feel that some legal speech is not treated equally? I'm
11.
by yqtjnvou 2y ago
> HN is friendly to freedom of speech because the site probably doesn't attract people that are easy to act out when offended or those that like to report people whose content they do not like. Or because of the occasional comment t
12.
Ask HN: Is there any place on the internet capable of freedom of speech?
37 points by yqtjnvou 2y ago|104 comments
13.
by yqtjnvou 2y ago
Well, that certainly proves my point. Apple and Microsoft made a fortune by stealing code and branding it as their own. Later on, both of them targeted a specific segment of users. Apple now consists of its own ecosystem, and they know that
14.
by yqtjnvou 2y ago
It won't work. Good products don't survive. If you look at the software industry, you'll notice that the software that generates income is the one that takes more than it gives. Whereas, the one that gives more either dying o
15.
by yqtjnvou 2y ago
But it won't be as successful. We're talking about money. There is much more effort in building quality products than more of the same. For quality, you get 2x competition, rather than just a .. competition when building more of t
16.
by yqtjnvou 2y ago
Scrum is useless. it's just another method of demanding results. Where there isn't anything to tell, you shouldn't be forced to do so. All this imbecility does is to create competition, and weed out the ones that don't c
17.
Ask HN: Do you feel like whatever makes money is detrimental to everything?
7 points by yqtjnvou 2y ago|7 comments
18.
by yqtjnvou 2y ago
This is good advice, actually. If you can't perform simple things, how can you do complex ones? But this also borders on asceticism - the practice of letting go of worldly things, in pursuit of higher learning.