ypsu

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ypsu 4y ago

   I've looked into these in the past but I deemed them a too much of a hassle. I don't know what files I care about. The solution I'm proposing is simpler and doesn't require any daemons or figuring out the files I need.
2. 2.▲
   by ypsu 4y ago

   Thanks, I guess that could work. But still... I'd prefer a solution that doesn't require a daemon that has to continuously wake up and check for this. I wish for a cleaner solution. Besides, it doesn't fully solve my "sn
3. 3.▲
   by ypsu 4y ago

   > Disabling swap does not prevent disk I/O from becoming a problem under memory contention, it simply shifts the disk I/O thrashing from anonymous pages to file pages. This is my pet peeve when using linux as desktop. Does anyo
4. 4.▲
   by ypsu 9y ago

   I see a few people complaining about oom killing. Allow me to make a case for it. I think oom killing is a very pragmatic solution to deal with low memory. Without overcommit you don't need the oom killer. But just simply disabling ove