yout2

3 ms·

1.
by yout2 5y ago
I have one but find it frustrating to use. The hob is big enough to fit a large pan but only heats a 10cm circle in the middle. (And I have tried it with many induction-safe pots and pans.) Rather than physical buttons, it has touch sensors
2.
by yout2 5y ago
I think it does that for any translation term, I guess so that people can click again to hear it pronounced very clearly.
3.
by yout2 5y ago
It does the same for "pico de gallo", with comic effect. (But not "gallo pinto".)
4.
by yout2 5y ago
Another example: Java and C++ got disrupted by Python and Ruby, which were considered to be much simpler to read and write, but now we are seeing more static typing, for example Python with type hints and friendlier static languages like Go
5.
by yout2 6y ago
The issue is not the size of the stdlib but rather the process for how things get in there. IMHO Python's stdlib has a number of modules of sub-standard quality and design. It would be good to have a gradual process for inclusion in th
6.
by yout2 6y ago
I agree with you that it's great to have a comprehensive stdlib but I think the process should be careful and gradual. Python's stdlib has a lot of stuff that is not really best-in-class or consistent in design. I think with today
7.
by yout2 6y ago
I think the time is ideal for the "next Python". A new, general-purpose, beginner-friendly language focused on readability, but designed from the ground up with the techniques & features learned in the past 2 decades. Python h
8.
by yout2 6y ago
channels and dj_database_url, for example.
9.
by yout2 6y ago
OK thank you for the explanation :)
10.
by yout2 6y ago
Curious what you mean, more specifically? Django template language seems fine to me, but maybe I haven't used React enough to see where it is better.