youarentrightjr

8 ms·

61.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> What do you and them know that the countless extremely successful engineers who actually worked with Elon do not? Did you read my comment? "I have multiple friends in the industry, who have taken a trip through the company."
62.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> Why are they doing any better than any other firm then? Any other firm, you mean like the bloated and bureaucratic NASA/JPL/defense contractor madhouse? That's not much competition. > Why has Tesla been successful? Wh
63.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> Yeah he only micromanages (look at his old blog) every detail he has time for at an extremely successful aerospace engineering company, just an ideas guy. Have you ever spoken to someone who works at SpaceX? I have multiple friends in
64.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> I think OP was saying hotter part -> hotter radiator attached to the part, not that the part itself will radiate significantly. Hmm, surely the radiator can run at arbitrary temperatures w.r.t. the objects being cooled? I'm ass
65.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> [1]Robotaxi. Someone just drove coast to coast USA fully on autopilot. Where's the source for this?
66.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
Lasers, space, super geniuses, and most importantly money. You're worrying too much about the details and not enough about the awesomeness. But seriously, why are all the stans in these comments as unknowledgeable as Elon himself? Is t
67.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> I see what you’re saying - higher design temp radiates better despite more energy overall to dissipate. Yes, running hotter will cause more energy to be radiated. but These parts are not at all designed to radiate heat - just look at
68.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> You do not radiate all the heat away from a GPU, a modern GPU can run pretty hot. Fascinating. Tell me more. Where does the heat energy that isn't radiated away go?
69.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
On the off chance you're sincere and not just heavily over indexed into Elon stocks: It's trivial to understand why this is all hype if you pay attention to physics, as another commenter suggested earlier. https://en.wi
70.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> Yep, definitely being scammed by not dismissing things outside my area of expertise out of hand. I wish I had your confidence about everything! Instead you put your confidence in Elon, who has zero expertise in this area?
71.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> Have you considered that people smarter than you think it is plausible? I know many people smarter than me, plenty of them who have spent careers building data centers, and not one of them think this is plausible. You should consider w
72.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> Doesn't that linked webarchive page say specifically that the ACE is a "Apple/TI co-designed USB Type-C Port Controller" If that isn't a "USB Controller" what do you mean when you say "USB Contro
73.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
See my response to tpmoney - not all signals in the DFU port go to the port controller.
74.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> ChatGPT is wrong. The DFU port does go through a USB controller with firmware. [1] > [1] https://asahilinux.org/docs/hw/soc/usb-pd/ What in your linked page made you conclude this? Your link refe
75.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
Man... to live in your world...
76.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> The second amendment as a serious option for a regime reset button was always a fantasy. This federal government would happily take a lesson from the Chechen wars and use ballistic missiles against a rebelling city if the chips were do
77.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> ... Did you watch the videos from multiple people filming? Yeah, did you? Any more substantive discourse you'd like to add to the conversation? To be clear about the word "reasonable" in my comment, it's similar to
78.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> It's like designing new kinds of nerve gas, "quite sure" that it will only ever be in the hands of good guys who aren't going to hurt people with it. That's powerful naïveté. Once you make it, you can't co
79.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> but to think that ICE agents are going around and reenacting the opening scene from Inglorious Bastards shows that your worldview can't handle more nuance than "fascism? true/false". Precisely. There's no quest
80.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> This company is explicitly all about implementing remote attestation (which is a form of DRM): Is there a HN full moon out? Again, this is wrong. DRM is a policy. Remote attestation is a technology. You can use remote attestation to im
81.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> So your device had no user freedom. You're not doing much to refute the notion that these technologies are only useful to severely restrict user freedom for money. Would love to hear more of your thoughts on how the users of the d
82.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> Trusted boot is literally a form of DRM. A different one than remote attestation. No, it's not. (And for that matter, neither is remote attestation) You're conflating the technology with the use. I believe that you have only
83.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> Interesting. So what did the attestation say once I (random Internet user) updated the firmware to something I wrote or compiled from another source? The update is predicated on a valid signature.
84.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> Secure boot and attestation both generally require a form of DRM. They literally don't. For a decade, I worked on secure boot & attestation for a device that was both: - firmware updatable - had zero concept or hardware that c
85.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> Remote attestation is literally a form of DRM Let's say I accept this statement. What makes you think trusted boot == remote attestation?
86.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> Sounds like kernel mode DRM or some similarly unwanted bullshit. Look, I hate systemd just as much as the next guy - but how are you getting "DRM" out of this?
87.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> finding windfall after some unknown amount of time. No offense, but you're simply ignorant on this topic. https://scispace.com/pdf/a-guide-to-time-of-death-in-selecte... This is just one of literally thousand
88.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> For RFK that includes a roadkill bear. > No, we're discussing a bear that was dead by the road. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/roadkill Your interpretation is wrong, and potentially disingenuou
89.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> If it died due to disease We're discussing roadkill bear . Meaning a bear that was killed on the road (by a vehicle). It's technically true that it still could have any of the scary afflictions you mention, but that&#x
90.
by youarentrightjr 9mo ago
> This is the sort of misdirection that requires the follow up question "what is real food?". For RFK that includes a roadkill bear. What is wrong with roadkill bear? Genuinely asking.

More ›