youarentrightjr

10 ms·

91.
by youarentrightjr 10mo ago
> He's an absolute goddamn nutjob > He is a vaccine-denier > Anything he says has no validity Huh? Yeah, he's wrong about many things. But hurling epithets and constructing an argument via ad hominem isn't necessary.
92.
by youarentrightjr 10mo ago
> get ready to ramp up cyber cab production lines The word on the street is this is only 2 weeks out. Right after fulfilling the roadster orders. And right before the Dyson sphere that will power Grok AI is deployed.
93.
by youarentrightjr 10mo ago
> Desalination will be a West Coast thing. The East Coast has abundant fresh water. It's not entirely accurate to say that the West Coast doesn't have enough fresh water. Oregon and Washington have a lot of rain, and many groun
94.
by youarentrightjr 10mo ago
Not to pile on, but this is a similar vibe to people telling others to stop complaining about gas prices and just get an EV. Some people can't afford a $38k car, heck, for some even $10k for a car is out of reach. There are people who
95.
by youarentrightjr 10mo ago
> The median bill is estimated to be $135 – $165/month I have a hard time believing this; in the Bay Area, the privilege of simply having a 200A connection is $130/month.
96.
by youarentrightjr 10mo ago
> He's running for governor of California. He's apparently having trouble getting 6,000 signatures or $5000 to get on the ballot, so he's probably not a serious candidate. The popular, well funded politicians haven't
97.
by youarentrightjr 10mo ago
> I’ll take the bait. I’m guessing you don’t pay state tax in Kansas, so you don’t pay my salary. I’m totally down with anyone in the state reading my stuff, though. With all the federal education grants/aid/what have you, it&#
98.
by youarentrightjr 10mo ago
Sorry, what's the claim here? That electrek has a financial incentive in Tesla's failure? Or that they are reporting inaccurately?
99.
by youarentrightjr 10mo ago
The top 1% of earners aren't the capital owners , not even close.
100.
by youarentrightjr 10mo ago
> The lead "researcher" on that paper is a climate change denier who also claims covid didn't exist. He also used racial slurs against a former colleague. I invite you to read another important Wikipedia article: https:&#
101.
by youarentrightjr 10mo ago
> There are countless things that are fundamental to day to day life that can be abused but are vital in their non-abusive form. Great. Waiting for your argument on why this is one of them. > If you are making a claim based on informa
102.
by youarentrightjr 10mo ago
Don't take this the wrong way, but the run on sentences are quite hard to parse. > That’s a vague hypothetical Not at all. I'm simply asking whether you can see how speech restrictions can be abused. Nothing vague here. > I
103.
by youarentrightjr 10mo ago
> the people who engaged in it scientifically had nothing to fear Similar to the question of criminalizing "hate speech" - who gets to decide whether an engagement reaches the scientific threshold? Is it not obvious how policie
104.
by youarentrightjr 10mo ago
> Instead you had political figures, “experts” and tech sites suppress any and all discussion. What's ironic here is the other responses - vehemently defending this authoritarian thought control; while for the last two weeks, we get
105.
by youarentrightjr 10mo ago
You're conflating protecting children with "protect the children!". Required reading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Horsemen_of_the_Infocalyp...
106.
by youarentrightjr 10mo ago
Factorio is a clear exception here, not at all representative of the average experience.
107.
by youarentrightjr 11mo ago
Man, it's horrible people have such an emotional connection to art and businesses that keep their pets alive. If only we could transform these into an asset that extracted wealth, now that would be great for society! Think of all the e
108.
by youarentrightjr 11mo ago
You're operating insincerely by attacking low quality interpretations of what I'm saying, among other problems. For example: > You said "there is a legal requirement for directors of public companies to act in the financia
109.
by youarentrightjr 11mo ago
> All that means is that controlling shareholders can't use the company as a piggy bank and raid it to fund their other ventures Yes, you're getting it now. > It doesn't mean the business has to be "sustainable&quo
110.
by youarentrightjr 11mo ago
> Where are you getting this from? I seriously doubt you're operating sincerely in this thread, given your ability to cite Revlon. But on the off chance, start here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_v._Ford_M
111.
by youarentrightjr 11mo ago
Why bring up Revlon duties when as you say, their relevance is only during company acquisition or restructuring? It's well established over hundreds of years of case law that directors of public companies have to act in good faith to b
112.
by youarentrightjr 11mo ago
Zing! Gotem! Reddit moment xD
113.
by youarentrightjr 11mo ago
> despite your best efforts Citation needed.
114.
by youarentrightjr 11mo ago
I see these private equity takes on HN frequently and am really baffled by the ignorance. There's a very clear difference between a public and private company - the fiduciary duty to shareholders. There is a legal requirement for direc