yostrovs

85 ms·

961.
by yostrovs 9y ago
One more thing, is there somewhere I can look up the street rules of graffiti artists? Perhaps the trial judge wasn't working directly off of those, but then shouldn't there be rules, perhaps not coded on paper, that exist?
962.
by yostrovs 9y ago
I believe in contracts and I doubt there ever was a contract. This seems like someone thought that these walls will be forever theirs, though it was just a matter of a lenient landlord not caring too much about what was going on. And becaus
963.
by yostrovs 9y ago
It sounds like the real owner of the walls was the guy setting the schedule of who and when gets to paint said walls. The owner that holds the title to the building has been reduced to one of the artists, if that, who should have known bet
964.
by yostrovs 9y ago
What about the artists who covered up previously generated graffiti to display their own? Will they be prosecuted?
965.
by yostrovs 9y ago
California always amazes with its goals, decade after decade of leadership among the states. Building is promoted to improve affordability. Building is discouraged to preserve the environment and maintain a local culture. Building is promot
966.
by yostrovs 9y ago
The Times list, along with most everything else in the paper, as per their motto of "all the news that's fit to print," is essentially the sphere of approved thinking that a certain part of the populace approves of.
967.
Publisher of Newsweek and the Int Business Times Has Been Buying Ad Traffic(buzzfeed.com)
2 points by yostrovs 9y ago|0 comments
968.
by yostrovs 9y ago
Since the publishing industry as a whole is on the edge of bankruptcy, this is just a response to ad blockers not being able to block these kinds of ads. You didn't want ads, you get them anyway as part of fake reporting. People runnin
969.
by yostrovs 9y ago
Similar to Al Gore, if passed, she will claim credit for inventing Internet security.
970.
by yostrovs 9y ago
They already have a much faster air link built.
971.
The Torment of Ajit Pai(commentarymagazine.com)
2 points by yostrovs 9y ago|0 comments
972.
by yostrovs 9y ago
You must be a concealed carry pistol holder by the same arguments. You can't trust anyone out there. If one person is dangerous, anyone else can be.
973.
by yostrovs 9y ago
The Internet was not a platform for users. It was a platform for nuclear weapons, therefore by your logic anything that's been done to it since the 1960s must simply be wrong. Why don't you go and start your own network where you
974.
by yostrovs 9y ago
Thanks for providing a recipe of a society where everybody hates each other because everybody is trying to "make money" off of each other. In reality, you're getting free content for which you're "paying" with
975.
by yostrovs 9y ago
Do you even know what you're arguing about?
976.
by yostrovs 9y ago
You obviously have no clue, nor respect, of what efforts go into substantive websites that create original content. Just because you found a technical way to avoid advertising doesn't mean that you morally deserve to receive free conte
977.
by yostrovs 9y ago
It would be great that the people that promote blocking ads would also promote sponsoring the websites that they frequent somehow. There is a real problem out there for all sorts of websites trying to survive and their problems are at least
978.
The Google-Facebook Duopoly Threatens Diversity of Thought(wsj.com)
319 points by yostrovs 9y ago|216 comments
979.
by yostrovs 9y ago
Thank you for an interesting answer to the question raised. The censors still down vote it. Unbelievable.
980.
by yostrovs 9y ago
This is evidence that net neutrality is an imagined monster for a lot of people.
981.
by yostrovs 9y ago
Anyone wanting to experience this effect without going to San Francisco can try it here on HN. I've seen smart and reasonable but unpopular comments disappear with amazing speed and also seen people wondering why our government would d
982.
by yostrovs 9y ago
Well, that's how democracies work. And the people of Europe can vote him out when his term is up. Hardy har...
983.
by yostrovs 9y ago
But in reference to the original comment, it was in the U.S. that Netflix succeeded, though it was supposedly stifled here. It just makes no sense.
984.
by yostrovs 9y ago
Right, it'll go back to being what it was before 2015 when net neutrality was instituted. The dread is unrelatable.
985.
by yostrovs 9y ago
Lack of creativity, and often bad reasons, inevitably result in taxation as a way to get people to behave how you'd like. Punish, punish, punish and maybe they'll learn something.
986.
by yostrovs 9y ago
The word "socialism" is missing from the article. The situation must be a natural disaster.
987.
Thoughts on net neutrality from the coal mine(thetrichordist.com)
3 points by yostrovs 9y ago|0 comments
988.
by yostrovs 9y ago
Amazing how downvotes correlate with the political opinion of the people here. And then you see comments like "I haven't even seen anti net neutrality arguments at all.. Why would the FCC do that?" You choose to close your ey
989.
by yostrovs 9y ago
Yeah, there was a time, when the internet was full of independent, freedom seeking people that wanted the government to stay out of it and not fuc it up like so many industries before. Just look at our train system that it spent decades per
990.
by yostrovs 9y ago
Its slant depends on who is the prime minister.

More ›