yoo1I

19 ms·

151.
by yoo1I 11y ago
Might still need some work though: Chromium 49. The only place I am logged into is Reddit > Twitter: logged in > Facebook: logged in > Google Plus: logged in > Reddit: logged in > Flickr: logged in
152.
by yoo1I 11y ago
One is a tool that can be (and is being) used for all sorts of good purposes; run by mostly volunteers and whose entire reason for existence is not policing their network, because that would defeat the entire purpose of the endeavor. The
153.
by yoo1I 11y ago
What's your timeline for being as open as the Tor folk about abuse of your network and start taking responsibility for all sort of internet scum being protected by your network and allowing them use of your infrastructure? You seem kee
154.
by yoo1I 11y ago
Aye, thanks for the write-up! I don't really get them either, surely they have enough paying customers to be able to afford some basic data hygiene. I'd really like to find some ways to make it more costly for them to keep the scu
155.
by yoo1I 11y ago
You still purposefully resolve spam domains on at least tim.ns.cloudflare.com and leah.ns.cloudflare.com and refuse do to anything about it. I see a certain hypocrisy in claiming to protect your customers, and at the same time enabling crim
156.
by yoo1I 11y ago
It's just really annoying when it's a government system and it's use is required. This is slightly off topic, but I recently came across a lawsuit involving German passport and their having a person's name printed IN ALL
157.
by yoo1I 11y ago
It was the apple watch. It also had problems with wrist tattoos.
158.
by yoo1I 11y ago
It's a value judgement. From the point of an officer in danger, a killed adversary is one where they can be 100% sure that the danger from that particular individual is eliminated. That's just good policy if your main objective is
159.
by yoo1I 11y ago
I think that's an entirely reasonable policy.
160.
by yoo1I 11y ago
You ask of evidence in a thread about a man being killed by police emptying multiple magazines into and the area around him . That doesn't even sound like shoot-to-kill that sounds like they were afraid to death. There's plenty o
161.
by yoo1I 11y ago
Well, obviously the less police and the general public are put in this position the better, and when there is a gunman running around the neighborhood, there better be police to subdue, and yes, if it's required to save other lives, ki
162.
by yoo1I 11y ago
> Police training demands they shoot to kill. Something that is incredibly fucking stupid, and there are plenty of countries who do very well without this misguided use of of lethal weapons.
163.
by yoo1I 11y ago
You're right, let's pretend we live in lalautopia where everyone is treated equally and past and ongoing injustices don't affect anyone's lives today. Reality is much more palatable that way. passes the joint to M
164.
by yoo1I 11y ago
This seems to be the same functionality that pass[0] offers. [0] https://www.passwordstore.org/
165.
by yoo1I 11y ago
Yeah I thought about that as well when I wrote down the above. Doing general localization is really hard if you want to do it well. If you know your approximate audience, you probably have to tailor your localization to them, instead of eve
166.
by yoo1I 11y ago
My mother was a saint!! ... when I just still wet behind the ears I was studying the codebase of my first job, and came across a quite extensive badwords.txt . On asking why we had a the dictionary of cussing in our project, I found out tha
167.
by yoo1I 11y ago
Hi, sorry for the late reply. I meant it in the sense that it seems intuitively correct that you'd be able to get some random data out of a microphone somehow, but that intuition doesn't serve as a good adviser in cryptography. I
168.
Why the OPM Hack Is Far Worse Than You Imagine(lawfareblog.com)
15 points by yoo1I 11y ago|0 comments
169.
by yoo1I 11y ago
Based on the information that's in there, this makes mutual authentication based on TLS certifictes (or some other public-key-scheme) mandatory, and uses it for addressing. The only information that this talk contains about how to solv
170.
by yoo1I 11y ago
Summary: http://www.seif.place "HTML free based application delivery system based on [stripped down] node.js and QT" He describes a "Helper Application" that he wants to convince browser vendors to install. F
171.
by yoo1I 11y ago
I can't find any textual summary about what "the seif project" is supposed to be. All I can find are talks and announcements for these talks. There is a github repository[0] that doesn't have a description and a pretty u
172.
by yoo1I 11y ago
That technology has been commercially available at least since 2003 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xj8jQy4nqLA
173.
by yoo1I 11y ago
The first time I heard of this technique it was (supposedly?) used for airgapped, infected machines to communicate [0]. I don't remember, though if it was proven in the end that that was actually how the malware communicated. There was
174.
by yoo1I 11y ago
I've never been on LinkedIn and I received email from them harvesting other peoples' address books, and nothing short of shouting at them made them stop.
175.
by yoo1I 11y ago
See the problem is getting at the actual perpetrators. You are surely correct, the further down the line they can be stopped the better. But due to they way these scammers operate it becomes difficult to impossible to reach them. One action
176.
by yoo1I 11y ago
"Consumer Security Solution"? Your advocating is pretty devilish indeed I think you are misunderstanding what's going on and it seems you are not aware that dealing with network resource abuse is a normal thing in the running
177.
by yoo1I 11y ago
Let me preface this thusly: I understand you are a reverse proxy. Do not try and explain this to me again. I've heard it so many times by now, when it really wasn't necessary for you to explain it to me again - or on the first pla
178.
by yoo1I 11y ago
Dear CloudFlare, now that you're a registrar, will you respond to abuse reports about scammers' domains being resolved by your DNS servers by at least showing that you've understood the problem instead of a generic "We R
179.
by yoo1I 11y ago
Because by taking complete control of a suspects computer, with a software that's essentially a version of backorifice, you're mudding up all the evidence you might have found. A wiretap is completely passive. Sure one might fake
180.
by yoo1I 11y ago
Not a tutorial, but I was having trouble with that damn 'official' Letsencrypt client and the complexity of adding a .wellknown directory on every site I needed a certificate for. So I saw the light in the form of a bash-script

More ›