Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
yole
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
yole
11y ago
Right now developing a new backend for Kotlin is much harder than necessary because the compiler doesn't have any IR and any desugaring passes - in other words, each backend has to work directly with the full AST (annotated with types
32.
▲
by
yole
11y ago
If you'd like to get a 50% discount on the book, you can use the coupon code 'mljemerov'.
33.
▲
“Kotlin in Action” Book from Manning Is in MEAP
(manning.com)
3 points
by
yole
11y ago
|
1 comments
34.
▲
by
yole
11y ago
Actually this is being worked on right now: https://github.com/orangy/dokka/pull/32
35.
▲
by
yole
11y ago
Then the example on the index page could be updated to sound more convincing. You don't need big data and machine learning to detect a wildcard import.
36.
▲
by
yole
12y ago
So, given that IntelliJ IDEA has been in development for 14 years and XCode for 11, when would you expect Google to release a high-quality IDE if they started from scratch today?
37.
▲
by
yole
12y ago
The majority of new features developed by the Android Studio team are integrated into IntelliJ, so if you're already using IntelliJ version 14, there is no big advantage to switching to Android Studio.
38.
▲
by
yole
13y ago
Does it stay there all the time? CPU going above 100% during indexing and inspections is normal; we use multiple cores to complete the operations faster.
39.
▲
by
yole
13y ago
If you can reproduce the problems, please submit a memory snapshot as described in http://devnet.jetbrains.com/docs/DOC-1212
40.
▲
by
yole
13y ago
Google is not paying anything for the development of Android Studio. Instead, they've put their own development team to work on the Android features in Android Studio, which we then integrate into our distribution of IntelliJ IDEA.
41.
▲
by
yole
13y ago
Our code is a fork of pydev's implementation on the back-end and our own implementation on the front-end, and we've made many improvements to pydev's code since the fork. If you find anything lacking, please file feature requ
42.
▲
by
yole
13y ago
It is, sorry about that. We plan to change the UI back to a simpler version in one of the coming updates.
43.
▲
by
yole
13y ago
The source code of PyCharm Community Edition will be added to the IntelliJ IDEA Community Edition repository in the coming days.
44.
▲
by
yole
13y ago
It's actually the other way round: it could become official and supported by Google because we had released it for free before that.
45.
▲
by
yole
13y ago
The reasons for the decisions are different each time. As for Android, we felt that IntelliJ IDEA Community Edition didn't have as much uptake was we had expected, and we thought that adding Android support to CE would be a great way t
46.
▲
by
yole
13y ago
Yes, there will be a version of the Python plugin compatible with the IDEA community edition.
47.
▲
by
yole
13y ago
The link wasn't posted by anyone from JetBrains as far as I can see. But we do always watch comments on Reddit and HN for the discussions of our stuff.
48.
▲
by
yole
13y ago
Thanks! Will fix.
49.
▲
by
yole
13y ago
First, with PyCharm there is a possibility to have both a community edition which covers a sufficient breadth of scenarios and a good value-add for the professional version to make it commercially attractive. This wouldn't work for oth
50.
▲
by
yole
13y ago
If you look at the feature comparison matrix, you'll see that the Community edition specifically excludes the features which are part of WebStorm. So no, don't hold your breath.
51.
▲
by
yole
13y ago
Possibly at some point. Right now we aren't working on Go support and don't have any short-term plans to start.
52.
▲
by
yole
13y ago
PyCharm Community Edition does support HTML but does not support JavaScript or CSS. PyCharm Professional Edition does support HTML, JS and CSS (and many dialects thereof).
53.
▲
by
yole
13y ago
The source code of PyCharm Community Ediion will be added to the IntelliJ IDEA Community Edition repository in the coming days.
54.
▲
by
yole
13y ago
No, this is very unlikely. (JetBrains CTO here, by the way.)
55.
▲
by
yole
13y ago
What exactly do you expect to get in your mail? Just install the new version and import the settings from the previous one, and it'll work with your current license.
56.
▲
by
yole
14y ago
First of all, it's far, far easier to write a plugin adding the "shiny" editor stuff to an IntelliJ Platform-based IDE. As far as the editor features are concerned, the only stuff Sublime does that would be non-trivial to implement in Intel
57.
▲
by
yole
17y ago
We have a single IDE already - it's called IntelliJ IDEA, and it supports all the other languages via plugins. However, we find that developers who use a specific language are far more willing to try an IDE tailored for that language, rathe
58.
▲
by
yole
17y ago
Here you go: http://plugins.intellij.net/plugin/?idea&id=3370 You'll need to install it manually, but it works in PyCharm just fine.
59.
▲
by
yole
17y ago
Could you please provide some examples of incorrect errors reported by PyCharm? You can file bug reports in our issue tracker: http://youtrack.jetbrains.net/
60.
▲
by
yole
17y ago
Already in development, coming soon.
More ›