yharris

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by yharris 6y ago

   I don't really see much value in debating the procedural aspects (Nature review process etc). I see a lot of value discussing the research and its content. We think the results shown in the paper are significant and of some importanc
2. 2.▲
   by yharris 6y ago

   That's a very good point - and it really motivates these kinds of computer searches. The Nature paper has quite a lot of detail in its supplementary https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs415...
3. 3.▲
   by yharris 6y ago

   Full disclosure- I am one of the authors of the paper. Note that the blog you're citing was written a year and a half ago. It refers to a select few conjectures, and naturally has no references to the developments in the past year and