yehosef

8 ms·

31.
by yehosef 3y ago
this sounds like what I was thinking. I wasn't sure how time would factor into this.
32.
by yehosef 3y ago
could it do something like detect a delay in the person's response? do LLMs know anything about time?
33.
Ask HN: When will LLMs be able to interrupt or interject?
48 points by yehosef 3y ago|62 comments
34.
by yehosef 3y ago
Thanks for putting our problems in perspective.
35.
by yehosef 3y ago
One of the biggest mistakes people make thinking the simulation theory is the idea that the "host universe" resembles anything like ours or has any of the limitations that our universe has. It doesn't.
36.
by yehosef 3y ago
This is how it's done - https://bit.ly/simulation-proof-script
37.
by yehosef 3y ago
The real interesting part is when happens the supreme court rules this new law "unreasonable".
38.
by yehosef 3y ago
>The supreme court which is supposedly independent and a very strong human rights law This is the problem - the supreme court is very leftist and has the "authoritarian power" to reject any bill they deem "unreasonable&quo
39.
by yehosef 3y ago
The question he avoids is is it possible for the supreme court to have too much power? This is exactly what the other side says is happening. Today's vote was on a concept called "reasonableness" which means that the Supreme
40.
by yehosef 3y ago
this is what it is.
41.
by yehosef 3y ago
Governments do not just "remove the banking license" of JP Morgan.
42.
by yehosef 3y ago
Right! The fact that Arab-oil countries want to join BRICS and are starting to trade in Yuan instead of Dollars is also going to accelerate this. https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/five-arab-states-plus...
43.
by yehosef 3y ago
>no, the move away from the dollar will not hurt the US. This is wrong - as you point out. When people don't need dollars except to buy/sell from the US, the dollar is a less attractive currency to keep around. This is going t
44.
by yehosef 4y ago
https://nonzero.substack.com/p/ok-its-time-to-freak-out-abou...
45.
by yehosef 4y ago
I assume that humans will still play a role for a while - but it still seems as if going to cause massive changes to society.
46.
by yehosef 4y ago
I've never heard of this definition of the singularity. Wikipedia (for whatever that's worth) defines it as follows: "The technological singularity—or simply the singularity[1]—is a hypothetical future point in time at which
47.
by yehosef 4y ago
HN discussion about the topic https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35214985
48.
by yehosef 4y ago
Here's an article that seems to indicate yes: https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-unpredictable-abilities-e...
49.
Ask HN: Does GPT-4 signal the start of the singularity?
4 points by yehosef 4y ago|13 comments
50.
by yehosef 4y ago
I think that part of the suspicion of research like this comes from years of complete lies about the dangers of cannabis. The fact that is still classified as a schedule-1 drug even though we know that it's nowhere near as dangerous a
51.
by yehosef 4y ago
If your org was hacked by the Russians/Chinese and was a national safety system, then you might be right to start there.
52.
by yehosef 4y ago
in unrelated news - https://techcrunch.com/2021/02/23/solarwinds-hackers-targete... ;) /humor
53.
by yehosef 4y ago
don't forget about this beauty https://techcrunch.com/2021/02/23/solarwinds-hackers-targete...
54.
by yehosef 4y ago
sorry- it was sarcasm - I'll try to remember to put a <sarcasm> next time.
55.
by yehosef 4y ago
sorry - it was sarcasm. search "noble lie" and covid and you'll see the reference to Fauci.
56.
by yehosef 4y ago
yes - search "noble lie" covid and you'll understand the reference.
57.
by yehosef 4y ago
but it was a "noble lie" for the interest of the public. I think those are allowed.
58.
by yehosef 4y ago
no, I mean other doctors that prescribe a safe drug. If the inmates had too much, they had too much. And experimenting or giving a treatment without proper disclosure is wrong and the doctor should lose their license for that - if nothing
59.
by yehosef 4y ago
Any discussion of this that ignores the role of vaccine manufacturers in this process are simply lacking. The government had no real incentive to push a policy against science except financial interests (and the influence of people with fi
60.
by yehosef 4y ago
been there, done that.

More ›