yeetard

10 ms·

1.
by yeetard 3y ago
If OpenAI did the same with Dall-e (provide you a snippet, within the legal limits of what they are able to reproduce. They can also direct you to buy a copy of it through them, if the publisher has a deal with [them]) things would be diffe
2.
by yeetard 3y ago
You can not compare a single instance of whacky artwork created in parody of a pop culture figure to the machine that plagiarizes the work of thousands of people and an artstyle developed over decades. >what is the potential harm here? L
3.
by yeetard 3y ago
I don't know, what I do know is that every book on Google Books worth reading is behind a paywall
4.
by yeetard 3y ago
The trademarks
5.
by yeetard 3y ago
>They've had their content mocked, copied and even used as hate speech for decades now. Yeah, by actual PEOPLE not corporations. Even then you aren't allowed to use copyrighted trade marks what the hell?? >There's a goo
6.
by yeetard 3y ago
There isn't a human in the loop.
7.
by yeetard 3y ago
Still not legal right? I can kinda get posters but unless they aquired the right to every single frame in every single movie they used... Google can't show you links to streaming websites. Get caught making a camrip you go to fucking j
8.
Ask HN: Genuine confusion over AI generated fake Disney Pixar movie posters
2 points by yeetard 3y ago|16 comments
9.
by yeetard 3y ago
this is a hilarious example for a serious problem. well done!
10.
Llamahub.ai(llamahub.ai)
19 points by yeetard 4y ago|1 comments
11.
by yeetard 4y ago
A repository of data loaders for LlamaIndex and LangChain
12.
by yeetard 4y ago
kinda??
13.
by yeetard 4y ago
personally i'm just so grateful that I got to experience the "authentic" "unpolluted" version of the internet.
14.
by yeetard 4y ago
Does freedom matter when there's nothing left to do?
15.
by yeetard 4y ago
since UBI does not mean "unlimited consumptions for everyone" but some people will definetly want to consume more than others, and assuming with rampant automation there will just be basically zero jobs available exclusively for h
16.
by yeetard 4y ago
true also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloom's_2_sigma_problem
17.
by yeetard 4y ago
Hmmm... Seems like the traditional vector skin actually brakes the page now? Charts and pictures are all over the place.
18.
by yeetard 4y ago
Thank you so much actually
19.
by yeetard 4y ago
never before seen so much cope in a HN comment section. lmao
20.
Ask HN: The new Wikipedia design sucks. How do I get the old page layout back?
1 points by yeetard 4y ago|3 comments
21.
by yeetard 4y ago
I laughed
22.
by yeetard 4y ago
It's funny how the comment section here is already prime example of people having v̵e̵r̵y̵ ̵p̵o̵o̵r̵ no attention management skill. How about we stop lamenting the obvious and start thinking about how we could solve the problem? Theore
23.
by yeetard 4y ago
By delegating control to an algorithm.
24.
by yeetard 4y ago
Emphasis on "in the real world".
25.
by yeetard 4y ago
The question is, why did they disappear? Did people just stop caring about things? Who in the right mind would ever want to use reddit -in general- and who would want to use it as long as there is a traditional forum for <topic>?
26.
by yeetard 4y ago
big if true
27.
by yeetard 4y ago
Yeah, general channels are too ADHD and inferior to dedicated threads.
28.
by yeetard 4y ago
>Dude, just turn old In all seriousness, I can't believe that we still haven't solved this. Crazy advanced social media but no workaround for the "networking problem". No, not gonna suggest we need a "productivit
29.
by yeetard 4y ago
>asking a question is not possible unless you personally find someone (or someones) qualified to answer it. Ah, so we're at this old problem again (The you-need-to-know-the-right-people-problem). That didn't take long. How do I
30.
Ask HN: Where do you go to ask questions that don't fit stackexchange.com?
28 points by yeetard 4y ago|32 comments

More ›