yeet_yeet_yeet

3 ms·

1.
by yeet_yeet_yeet 4y ago
Oh wow https://www.apple.com/child-safety/pdf/CSAM_Detection_Techni... so they essentially just use CNN output to automatically determine whether to report people to the authorities? For some reason I assumed they
2.
by yeet_yeet_yeet 4y ago
>not realistic The odds are zero. 1/2^256 = 0. In cryptography these odds are treated as zero until you generate close to 2^128 images. Unfortunately there's no word in natural English to describe how unlikely. The most precise
3.
by yeet_yeet_yeet 4y ago
Could you provide an example?
4.
by yeet_yeet_yeet 4y ago
The quality of the topic directly correlates with the quality of editors it attracts. So of course The Great Gatsby is going to have a terrible article. Because it's a miserable book If you care so much about The Great Gatsby , then
5.
by yeet_yeet_yeet 4y ago
Counterargument: none of these work if the page is edit-protected. There you just have to trust that the admins with edit access are acting in good faith. From my experience, they usually do, though.
6.
by yeet_yeet_yeet 4y ago
> Wikipedia is not a reliable source for any controversial topics or people. Maybe this is true for certain modern topics, but I was able to learn most of 20th century history due to Wikipedia. Want to read about MK Ultra? https:/&
7.
by yeet_yeet_yeet 4y ago
There are consequences of this. For sbf, orange man, elmo, maybe not yet, but there will be. Which is why most people stay in line.
8.
by yeet_yeet_yeet 4y ago
Pretty sure he's given up at this point. Nobody would do something this dumb otherwise. And then confirm it the next morning.
9.
by yeet_yeet_yeet 4y ago
What about you just keep custody of your own damn coins? Isn't that the point of cryptocurrency, that it's like cash except you don't have to physically carry it.