yebyen

88 ms·

841.
by yebyen 9y ago
The Docker approach is IMHO the most reasonable approach, but the fact is that "in a container" is still regarded as a bad word in many places. We're talking about containers but mostly still embargoed from using them for an
842.
by yebyen 9y ago
This may not be a popular opinion (or maybe it's the most popular opinion), but if I'm using pretty much any language for anything that is in development or in any way home-baked (so, it didn't itself come from a distro packa
843.
by yebyen 9y ago
Seconded that: > Not getting root on your own machine as a developer? was the origin of this thread, and there are tons of places where developers are not permitted root access to their own dev machines. We are not all talking about pro
844.
by yebyen 9y ago
I will say that my professor Axel Schreiner at RIT offered one of the two first Golang classes at a collegiate level back in... 2009? and he reached out to Google and said, "send us some Android phones so that we can develop Go on ARM&
845.
by yebyen 9y ago
What is this awspec? I would like to subscribe to your blog or mailing list! :+100:
846.
by yebyen 9y ago
This is a great way to go, but I think you're actually asking GP to have his cart before his horse. This is how I learned and how you learned, I'd guess... by typing the command into a terminal. Am I being luddite? I had to be
847.
by yebyen 9y ago
The biggest driver is actually just to not be behind. You can tell already from what little conversation we've had that "always be upgrading" is not a cultural practice here (yet.) We have regular meetings about changing that
848.
by yebyen 9y ago
Thanks! I will check it out! It just hasn't been a priority. I have no need for RBAC at this point, as I am the only cluster admin, and the whole network is fairly well isolated. I couldn't really think of a good reason to not up
849.
by yebyen 9y ago
that's Canonical, with a capital C
850.
by yebyen 9y ago
I have my group's internal Jenkins service hosted on a single node EC2 instance running Kubernetes (t2.medium) and I would echo all of the advice you're getting. Kubeadm, definitely. And moreover, don't call it production-r
851.
by yebyen 9y ago
I would be careful trying too hard to fit anything at all through that loophole though, as I'm pretty sure in California, companies that push employees to sign non-compete agreements that are deemed unenforceable (which is objectively
852.
by yebyen 9y ago
In California, judges do laugh at them, because the vast majority of US non-compete agreements would be unenforceable in California. Employees can be prohibited from using trade secrets from the job after their employment is ended as you s
853.
by yebyen 9y ago
So your friend connected to a WiFi network and didn't tell Windows that it was metered... and Windows assumed it wasn't metered. This is what they are trying to explain. There is a way to tell Windows that the network is metered
854.
by yebyen 9y ago
Yes, ultimately the banks are going to be on the hook one way or another for fraud, even if it's based on rising insurance premiums that come when they are identified as a statistically good target for fraudsters, because of poor KYC p
855.
by yebyen 9y ago
I'm not one to defend the CRAs, but if their job is to make a note when a credit file is opened, and not to do the heavy lifting of verify identities, I will concede that actually it's really not always the CRAs that are in the wr
856.
by yebyen 9y ago
That's really not what parent poster was asking for... "Pay $10 and follow onerous procedures to unfreeze" and "receive a notification on my phone when my file is opened" are really not in the same class of interact
857.
by yebyen 9y ago
That's funny. This one says everything is still fine: https://status.bitbucket.org/
858.
by yebyen 9y ago
We are also noticing that Bitbucket is down.
859.
by yebyen 9y ago
You are remarkably well positioned to take advantage of any solution from what you've told. My group is skipping Kubernetes to go straight to Fargate and we are... not so we'll positioned as you happen to be. Much to my chagrin, a
860.
by yebyen 9y ago
Yeah, "phoneticity" is a new word for me, but I'm assuming you mean retaining the (sometimes bizarre) original spelling of loan words so that it's clearer where they came from. In a language like Polish where rules are r
861.
by yebyen 9y ago
> > The second is that pronunciation inherently shifts over time so you must continually tinker with spelling > Not really? Last spelling change was before WW2 I am not an expert but I've taken a class called language variatio
862.
by yebyen 9y ago
I know, so you pay your taxes and now you might as well have been a day trader for the levels of complexity that adds to your tax accounting burden. Not sure what my point was really — that's just about exactly how this plays out.
863.
by yebyen 9y ago
Yeah, business. So about those transaction fees... you can save money by grouping your transactions and clearing them in blocks. Now you're dangerously close to figuring out that you can make more money by waiting for the best time to
864.
by yebyen 9y ago
I think the key is that you must have a shared secret in advance, which is probably something you won't have in most cases unless you're building a point-to-point encryption. I'm afraid I don't have such an article, and
865.
by yebyen 9y ago
It's not a given that something like Diffie-Helman shared secret is going to put the actual secret on the wire during authentication, or that smart auth strategies similar to this one that don't directly transmit secrets are alway
866.
by yebyen 9y ago
Thanks for telling, I found the rebase extension on my own but I don't know what Mercurial users are using unless you tell me and I would not have found the evolve extension on my own :D I will probably check it out, to be fair it seem
867.
by yebyen 9y ago
Then committer can either 'git push --force' which apparently is not allowed by mercurial too? Or create a new branch. I try to clean up working branches when they are not needed anymore. I get the idea that Mercurial users thin
868.
by yebyen 9y ago
I went looking for Mercurial documentation about how to rebase and found this: > Rewriting of history has ramifications if you’ve previously pushed those commits elsewhere. In Mercurial, you simply cannot push commits that you later inte
869.
by yebyen 9y ago
What is a simple (or should I say easy?) workflow that allows three (or three hundred) people to work on the same codebase? I'd challenge that there isn't one, and that sometimes a complex problems has a complex solution. I think
870.
by yebyen 9y ago
Site is evidently crumbling under load... getting some 50x responses from the load balancer. (edit: seems ok now?)

More ›