yeahitslikethat

16 ms·

91.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
They want that to happen if it means they can accelerate profits plus interest on the loans faster than new fine minus $5 billion. Fed is a corporation source, there are plenty. It's common knowledge, " the United States Court o
92.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
They are more like loan sharks who require human beings as collateral.
93.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
The US treasury loans the cash at zero interest to the Fed (which is actually a coalition of corporate banks, not a federal government entity). The Fed then loans that money out with interest and backed by the good faith in the us govern
94.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
Wouldn't be the first time programmers were the only ones to do time for a company's crimes. But when I'm asked to implement robosigning and push back now I'm the bad guy. I won't do it, but another dev did against
95.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
Human beings as persons face existential punishment every day. Corporations a persons -- never. That's why they get away with this stuff no one thinks is good.
96.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
I'm doing the same thing now. I bet your people think you're as crazy as my people think of me. My other friends are spending thousands of dollars retrofitting lighting and everything when they could spend a fraction and write som
97.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
No. Those are for jewels and other goods that can't be represented with a number typed into a computer.
98.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
You could and generally should.
99.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
OK i restate. Replace, in my original post, "Rothschildren" with "goldsmithers." I didn't even know they were Jews and that whole bit is ad hominem at best. But my point remains. My money is not the bank's asse
100.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
Only a benevolent dictator could make that decision. As it stands people who already have more than they, plus several generations of their progeny, need make that decision. The owning of more stuff has contributed to an accelerated carbon
101.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
Only allow people to own and control what is naturally reasonable. If a lion kills more than will fit in its belly it shares the rest with the pride. If there's still more than the Lions can eat, the hyenas eat. Then the vultures. Th
102.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
"According to later estimates from CIA officials who worked on the U-2 project and the OXCART (SR-71, or Blackbird) project, over half of all UFO reports from the late 1950s through the 1960s were accounted for by manned reconnaissance
103.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
Controlled consumption.
104.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
Remember, fractional reserve banking started when the Rothschildren decided it was OK to tell their depositors their deposits were in the safe, when the bank had actually given it to other people. Our banking system is founded on a lie. I
105.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
The ufo conspiracies are an example of this. The government promoted ufo stories to distract from the real stories.
106.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
All the bad people need is for the good people to do nothing.
107.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
It's about recognition of value. If I earn $150/hr to write software and you suggest paying me $20/hr it means you don't properly value my time. A thank you and genuine appreciation is better.
108.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
I think the point is that open soource developers should either do it for love or as a job that pays the bills. If $20/hr pays the bills that's a good wage where it does. Arguably open source is MORE valuable so to suggest it earn
109.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
That this ad hominem attack is the top voted really illustrates the deterioration of the community here. You've added nothing of value.
110.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
Even Europe lives at unsustainable levels. The impoverished world wants better lives too. There's no way the west can continue to grow consumption. The world will run out of trees.
111.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
It's on amazon to pay off their technical debt. Not their customers. They are turning off a feature at their customers expense. That's the exact opposite of good customer service.
112.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
Right. And a country that's not even part of the conversation not having hvac totally invalidates my point according to the maximum number of people who can downvote it. It's simple math. They move out there to get a bigger house.
113.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
In order to save humanity we ALL need to downgrade the quality of our lives. That's exactly the point.
114.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
No. They care about consuming more resources from an overtaxed planet. Hvac, materials, fuel.
115.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
This is the general response from programmers toward tools that automate programming. It's also generally FUD about being replaced by said tools.
116.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
"In our effort to continuously improve customer experience, the path-style naming convention is being retired in favor of virtual-hosted style request format. Customers should update their applications" How does forcing customers
117.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
We see wealth as living in a big house. Not the net value of that house on a balance sheet. Reality is unimportant. Is perception that matters to society.
118.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
This is terrible advice. And Click bait. I'm fact the article gives a lists several things you should do to onboard customers.
119.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
What do you do when the problem is this one guy on the team who is incompetent, but put there by his friend, the cio?
120.
by yeahitslikethat 7y ago
Pressing the brake is positively correlated with the car going faster. Down hill. Good thing correlation is not an indicator of causation.

More ›