ybessyehs654

5 ms·

1.
by ybessyehs654 3y ago
Because he'll use his connections to raise funds for future Democratic causes.
2.
by ybessyehs654 3y ago
You must know absolutely nothing about the NHS if you consider it a success.
3.
by ybessyehs654 3y ago
"Israeli settlers in the west Bank shooting unarmed palistinians" What are you talking about? I can't find any video you're describing https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/search?q=palestinian
4.
by ybessyehs654 3y ago
Is it bullying if he vowed to never hire students who support Hitler? How is this different?
5.
by ybessyehs654 3y ago
WFH is not here. There are still a ton of new and laid off developers who need jobs.
6.
by ybessyehs654 5y ago
Sorry I don't seem to understand your argument. You're comparing the budgets in nominal terms without accounting for inflation. For example the $630 million this year won't be able to fund as many officers and services like t
7.
by ybessyehs654 5y ago
Again, this does not account for inflation (6.2%)
8.
by ybessyehs654 5y ago
The article he cites is from a June 24 bill that redirected $17 million from that police budget to violence prevention programs [1] [1] https://abc7news.com/oakland-police-funding-city-council-cut...
9.
by ybessyehs654 5y ago
The budgets shouldn't be compared in nominal terms because of inflation (6.2%) and the increased costs of pensions (more police officers retiring). Your article also says that 18% of the budget is now allocated to the police as compare
10.
by ybessyehs654 5y ago
The article you posted is dated July 1st. The author's citation for the "defunding" bill was approved on June 24 [1], in which funds were redirected from the police to "violence prevention programs." Obviously both