yamasanama

6 ms·

1.
by yamasanama 4y ago
Sure. But stating a belief without any reason why this would be true, or more precisely, why this hypothesis would be preferable over the currently accepted hypothesis which does have supporting evidence, is just not very convincing.
2.
by yamasanama 4y ago
What advantage does this theory have over the more common (?) assumption that the amino acids came to existence on earth itself? Serious question, I'd like to know. For example, this theory sti doesn't answer the question how they
3.
by yamasanama 4y ago
Is your belief based on any kind of evidence in which case I'd love to hear your best arguments, or is it a religios belief (like in Jesus) in which case there is not much to discuss?
4.
by yamasanama 4y ago
> We don't even really have an agreed-upon definition of life, so the question is basically non-sensical. ... > I am pretty sure we'd be able to recognize other types of life. ... > Source: I actually studied this in coll
5.
by yamasanama 4y ago
Not all issues are urgent. Most issues I encounter in my job are not urgent. Sometimes it's not even issues, perhaps just a random but interesting observation. It can be less distracting to the team to bring them up next time you have
6.
by yamasanama 4y ago
I don't understand what you are talking about. Obviously we don't sit in silence. Some things are just easier to discuss in a meeting than over 100 Slack messages. Those things we discuss in meetings.
7.
by yamasanama 4y ago
> I was totally exhausted by switching my leg between break and accelerator. This one deserves an immediate nomination for this week's first world problem.
8.
by yamasanama 4y ago
> It’s our industry’s equivalent to mise en place. What an excellent comparison! Thanks!
9.
by yamasanama 4y ago
> I'm not sure it can be removed, fundamentally. I've not had this for the last 10 years, so it can definitely be removed. Obviously everybody is welcome to bring up whatever is interesting nd worth discussing, and that's
10.
by yamasanama 4y ago
Yes, I can tell, because in the interview situation I'm sitting next to them. And print statements are sometimes the superior choice. This ties into my other comment that these things can be heavily subjective. As long as it gets the j
11.
by yamasanama 4y ago
Most non-trivial programming homework assignments in college require debugging and a good school will provide guidance of how to do this. One thing I do in job interviews is to have the candidate debug an issue (that they usually caused the
12.
by yamasanama 4y ago
> It produces this weird state where everyone saves up what they have to say for the meetings to avoid an awkward lack of participation or "I have nothing" in the meeting This is an odd meeting culture. Just remove the requirem
13.
by yamasanama 4y ago
There is a difference between "want to" and "have to". You are talking about the former. GP about the latter.
14.
by yamasanama 4y ago
Missing from this list is that lots of the mentioned concepts are highly subjective. There is no generally agreed-upon standard of what documentation is "proper". Or what "clean" code is. Or what "competence" l
15.
by yamasanama 4y ago
> Surely with a German passport this wouldn’t be a biggie. The U.S. PR lottery couldn't care less. Neither many other non-EU countries.
16.
by yamasanama 4y ago
I fully concur with everybody suggesting you to not skip a university education. As a basic example from this project, fundamentals of OT/CRDT which you need to deploy to make colab editing work correctly (you have used that, right?) a