Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
yAnonymous
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
31.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
What do people do who have to commute to the city for work? What do you do when you have to buy a few boxes of beer for a party that are too heavy to carry? How do emergency services work?
32.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
The EU should introduce a law that requires the sun to adjust to our time, not the other way around. Considering the technical expertise of the parliament members, I'd fully expect it to pass.
33.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
Apple are also well in the business for stupid patents, so they know better than to question it.
34.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
No, it doesn't question the number. It points out the obvious: that not all of them are criminals, which nobody said - but you implied it. Little racist yourself, eh? However, the chances for members of these families to become crimina
35.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
>I've traveled through pretty much all of Europe You haven't seen shit. Criminal family clans have an estimated 200.000 family members in Germany alone. This source is leaning extremely to the left so you can't accuse me o
36.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
>and from 2000 other ways to kill someone they chose something that's the equivalent of living their business card on the murder scene... This was always about sending a message. For that, it has to be obvious who did it.
37.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
He did however suggest that the UK, Dutch and Swiss agencies can't be trusted in this case, which is beyond laughable. It implies that another actor would have tried to kill former Russian agents and UK citizens with a chemical weapon.
38.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
Here's about the most prominent example. https://i.imgur.com/mY0iBWU.jpg That's an earlier screenshot of the page. It had about 2 million likes at the end. They posted provocative content, government critical stuf
39.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
>Do you have an example to share? Government critical pages with millions of followers were deleted, playing directly in the hands of the (re-elected) government. I don't want to be the judge of what's reasonable and what'
40.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
https://www.arvato.com/en/about/press/2018/facebook-and-arva... Directly from the devil himself. Arvato belongs to Bertelsmann. Here's a German article about how close they are to the government. h
41.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
I actually think it will hold up quite comfortably, as no court will be able to tell when exactly it starts being gambling.
42.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
The box system is exactly the same as before, only that you can see the contents of the next box. It's very easy to implement and, as you pointed out, changes pretty much nothing. The gamble is still there, but not in the box you pay f
43.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
No. The companies involved (Arvato/Bertelsmann) get to make their own rules. Facebook doesn't even have a say in this, although they're paying for it as required by the law. They were threatened with fines in the millions (up
44.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
See my other post. Hate speech laws are actively used in Germany to manipulate political campaigns. The legal process has been removed and private organizations close to the government get to decide what's hate speech and what's n
45.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
Ultimately, most publishers will probably handle it like Valve, who have found a brilliant workaround: Show players the contents of the next box they buy, which makes it not gambling. I hate it, but it's a very elegant solution to avoi
46.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
German here. Our government has pressured Facebook to allow private corporations (that of course are close to the government) to delete Facebook content -posts and pages with millions of followers- for political reasons as they see fit. The
47.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
The censor ship has long sailed and its first passengers were American copyright shills, followed by European criminals who wanted their crimes to be removed from Google.
48.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
A bunch of monkeys would have caught most of these bugs during testing - and have done a better job with the coding in the first place. > http://www.example.www.example.com -> example.example.com What the fuck. I don't
49.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
What you described is more likely to happen in a society where citizens are used to high standards and these standards can't be maintained. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think most Chinese workers only eat, sleep and work. How wo
50.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
Speak for yourself. There are plenty of alternatives where I am from (Europe) and running small, local ISPs works just fine. The situation in the 'country of the free and awesome'© is supposedly different, but that doesn't in
51.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
Facebook confronts people with their own contradicting behavior from the past and people hate that.
52.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
I wish this was only protectionism and stupidity, but you can bet that big producers have been lobbying for this to get more visibility on their shitty content. If there's one thing where the German TV industry equals the American one,
53.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
1. Display warning to the user that their ISP is throttling the traffic or doesn't provide enough bandwidth 2. Show them local alternative ISPs who don't have these problems 3. Take a signing bonus when users who had the warning d
54.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
Lying, especially for company profits or personal gains, is easily one of the most toxic and despicable things to do and people who do it so casually don't deserve a lot of respect. So yeah, my real life response to that would be very
55.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
No, the improvement comes from reversing the change. Turn things to shit, then take credit for improving them. Really smart move by the UX team.
56.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
The shitty UX will probably be the reason when I cancel my subscription one day. You're a billion dollar company and your web player has problems getting the focus right. You still haven't found a decent way -other than notificati
57.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
Almost 7 hours of sleep per night is more than sustainable. There are people who can get along with 5 hours of sleep per night without any impact to their health.
58.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
>Working 120 hours a week is not productive. My WoW character disagrees. Seriously though, if you enjoy what you're doing, doing a lot of it is fine.
59.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
Software development is a lot about making good use of resources and if you reinvent the wheel for every job you do, maybe it isn't your cup of tea. I've worked with developers who completely ignored good libraries and instead cre
60.
▲
by
yAnonymous
8y ago
I completely agree with aggressive background killing, because too many apps are abusing their permissions and try every trick in the book to siphon user data at all times. That being said, killing an app that is actively playing audio is n
More ›