3 ms·
No, it doesn't question the number. It points out the obvious: that not all of them are criminals, which nobody said - but you implied it. Little racist yoursel
by yAnonymous 8y ago
No, it doesn't question the number. It points out the obvious: that not all of them are criminals, which nobody said - but you implied it. Little racist yourself, eh? However, the chances for members of these families to become criminals are in fact very high and not being a criminal can also mean they just haven't been convicted.
I dare you to wear a jewish hat and go through one of those districts if you think the law will protect you - but of course people like you are all talk and no action.
Here's what very likely could happen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U82tPY7EyL8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U82tPY7EyL8
You're indirectly defending anti-semitism and it makes me sick.
>it's been an issue for the last 30 years
So why are you arguing it then, only to admit that it's a problem one sentence later?
- Daishiman 8y agoBecause the only people who can say realistically that it's a significant problem are coddled Northern Europeans who have never been to a single unsafe place in their lives. The Bronx at night is unsafe. Souther Buenos Aires at night is unsafe. Lima at any time of the day is unsafe. With some luck a few neighborhoods in Paris and London might not be great. I have literally walked all over every large German urban center at night. The only problem it has is the rampant alcoholism and the visibility of the most marginalized, which by the rest of the global standards (and the standards of the same country a few decades ago) are nothing. Seriously, literally, nothing. There's hardly other places in the world that are safer than these countries. Your cataclysmic rhetoric does not bode with reality. At all.