Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
xyzzyz
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
59 ms
·
811.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
Ah, now I understand. That makes total sense. Thanks for your detailed explanation.
812.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
Okay, so let me make sure I understand it. You have your own personal key, and CA key. Your personal (private) key lives on your workstation, and CA key lives on RPi. There are some other machines that you want to SSH into. They trust CA pu
813.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
So anyone on your LAN can visit the URL and download the CA private key? Isn’t it only marginally more secure than just keeping the private key on your workstation in the first place, and foregoing the entire rigamarole with certificates? I
814.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
That actually doesn’t answer my question (though the actual addressee answered it already quite satisfactorily). First, there is no such thing as CSR in context of ssh certificates: ssh certificates are not x.509 certificates (known for t
815.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
How do you issue client certificates? Do you not worry that the private key needed to issue these can also leak just the same as your personal private key?
816.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
> Without the ability to delegate, the logistics of needing to create an absolutely centralized authority to do the useful things we wanted to do within the organization raised the cost of "first value" too high for us to fuss
817.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
This is not a material distinction: for every pair (M, input) you can create a machine M’ which has no actual input and instead first writes down the input to M onto the empty tape, and then runs M. This technique practically allows you to
818.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
> No. They would just go elsewhere to commit offenses. This is just denying the offenders all agency. If they literally cannot help but commit crime, the response from the society should then be to lock them up, as unfit to live in the s
819.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
In fact, denying the courtesies and benefits to norm breakers is exactly how you improve society. That’s like raising a child: you won’t convince a toddler with a reasoned argument about empathy, the value of preserving shared norms, and
820.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
The time tested way of improving society is widespread shaming and bottom up enforcement of norms. We don’t do that anymore, lest the liberties of the norm breakers are lost, and their feelings injured.
821.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
You seem to have noticed the part where the parent comment says “don’t regulate”, but missed the part where it says “if the market will naturally fix itself”. Please, read it again, so that you can respond to what it actually says, instead
822.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
Scientific revolution played surprisingly little role in the early days of industrial revolution, which was mostly a result of north British engineers tinkering on and improving their production processes. Scientific advancements only becam
823.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
You have an extremely simplistic view of civilizations that lasted longer than almost all the ones currently existing. Imagine someone in year 4000 dismissing the French peoples as a whole as “violent and bitter enemies of scientific truth”
824.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
Which are clearly false when applied to the actual topic of discussion, so why bring them up?
825.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
Ah yes, the US universities are well known to hire the wealthiest elites as researchers. Poor foreign grad students are virtually absent from US universities.
826.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
That's not only extremely silly, it's in fact a pernicious kafkatrap. What if all globalists actually happened to be Jewish? There would have been no way to criticize them for their globalist ideas -- if you did that, you'd i
827.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
What are you even talking about?
828.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
The “Protestant” Northern Europeans in colonial America were anything but homogenous. New England Puritans not only had laws requiring Quakers to stay away, they in fact whipped, mutiliated and even executed those that refused to do so. T
829.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
Ah, yes, sorry, I got confused by this thread. Yes, globes are great educational tool. I think it’s actually valuable to show all of globes, Mercator, and the weird equal area projections, just to teach about trade offs.
830.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
Globes of size useful for navigation are too big to be convenient when actually navigating. You cannot flat pack globes. They’re just impractical for this purpose.
831.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
You’re missing the point completely. It’s not about law and regulation literally being append only, it’s rather about the number of laws and regulations consistently growing over time, with very little repeal of old regulation, which are
832.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
Human history is a story of repeated conquest, population admixture and/or replacement. Almost all “indigenous people” in present or past are just descendants of the most recent conquerors. Hardly any peoples have legitimate claim to l
833.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
All of what you describe above is good for the rental and housing market. It brings the rents down . Imagine the alternative, where all the depreciation rules you describe above don’t exist, and landlords have to pay a bunch more tax. In
834.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
> Would Linux not still exist in a similar form to today? Majority of work on Linux is done by people who are paid by their employers to do exactly that. Just look at this: https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.itsf
835.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
Richard Stallman was right in the same sense Karl Marx was right. The people would , in fact, be better off if each have according to his abilities, and received according to his needs. The problem here is the problem of incentives: you ca
836.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
> Homicide rates have been well reported since the 19th century, and they track the same general pattern as violent crime rates: There is one confounder here which makes the tracking progressively less and less good for past 50 years, an
837.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
I guess if you cook once every few months, that might be a concern.
838.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
> That's going to damage the coating, shortening the lifespan of the pan, and putting little bits of Teflon into your food. Out of the concerns above, pieces of Teflon in your food is fortunately not a huge concern: Teflon is not to
839.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
In fact, you can. See, for example ACE model, which explicitly attempts to separate generic causation from shared environment and from non-shared environment. This can be done using twin studies, by comparing correlations between monozygoti
840.
▲
by
xyzzyz
4y ago
No, in fact it means exactly that. This word has a technical meaning.
More ›