xxxxxxxx7

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by xxxxxxxx7 6y ago

   There's definitely something unsettling about the establishment departing from the pretty conventional and sensible idea that someone who's recovered from a disease doesn't need to be vaccinated against it.
2. 2.▲
   by xxxxxxxx7 6y ago

   > Can we stop with these headlines trying to scare people [...] What a funny time, after a full year of media-driven hysteria, to decide that this is a priority now!
3. 3.▲
   by xxxxxxxx7 6y ago

   Exactly! Let them have their dysfunctional indoctrination center that'll collapse under its own weight.
4. 4.▲
   by xxxxxxxx7 6y ago

   I don't think it's even accurate to phrase something as "reverse racism" anymore. Nowadays "whiteness" is openly discussed as evil, and it's obvious to reasonable people that such sweeping and metaphysical
5. 5.▲
   by xxxxxxxx7 6y ago

   > It's just to which degree you want those rails to be. In my experience as a queer person, lots of vocal pro-trans types take issue with anything and everything . It's not as though this is an issue of rails, because frankl
6. 6.▲
   by xxxxxxxx7 6y ago

   I haven't really examined the OP that closely to verify anything you're claiming but FWIW the experts screwed this up enough. > Almost as a parenthetical afterthought, the NEJM editorial inaccurately stated that 0.1% is the app