xvector

5 ms·

91.
by xvector 7mo ago
Nearly everyone I know that saw this stuff turned out just fine We do not need to turn society into a police state because we're afraid the next generation might not be able to handle what we handled fine for the most part Edge cases s
92.
by xvector 7mo ago
Eh I just decided that $3-5 extra is fine for not causing immense amounts of physical suffering to some poor animal for my burger meal.
93.
by xvector 7mo ago
> in what world does anything give you or anyone else the right to decide to probe people up their rear end A world in which these people bet on heinous things while insider trading/influencing those very things. Privacy in gambling
94.
by xvector 7mo ago
A lawsuit would just be the "cost of doing business" for Polymarket. Until there is no skin in the game, there will be no change or accountability. If CISOs can be held criminally liable for data breaches, the rest of C-suite can
95.
by xvector 7mo ago
> Palantir only works with democratic countries Irrelevant when the administrations of these countries have zero regard for constitutional rights. > no security clearance for people who have the wrong politics? Yup, seems to be Karp&#
96.
by xvector 7mo ago
Trivial to make a polymarket account without KYC
97.
by xvector 7mo ago
Could it be people dislike him because he enables anti-democratic capabilities like mass domestic surveillance, and enthusiastically supports an administration with little regard for the law?
98.
by xvector 7mo ago
Sure, and we can deal with that problem when it comes to it. For now, there are people at these companies that are clearly responsible and can be held accountable.
99.
by xvector 7mo ago
It is not capricious to hold C-suite legally accountable for their choices. Lots of corporate scandals would simply not have happened if decisionmakers had skin in the game. If CISOs can have personal liability for data breaches, CEOs can h
100.
by xvector 7mo ago
Betting markets are legally required to have KYC. If you or I operated a casino illegally we would ABSOLUTELY be thrown in jail. Do you seriously think fraudulent Xbox live transactions are on the same level of the heinous insider trading g
101.
by xvector 7mo ago
Polymarket's founder is Shayne Coplan, 27-year old "youngest self-made billionaire" (why do all billionaires seem devoid of ethics?) A sane system would just throw him in jail until his illegal betting market implements KYC.
102.
by xvector 7mo ago
When was the last time you heard of a DJ doing classical?
103.
by xvector 7mo ago
Author seriously needs to touch grass. > [list of 20 classical artists] I’m aware that many people are unfamiliar with this musical tradition, but it forms one of the sturdiest pillars of what we casually refer to as “western civilizati
104.
by xvector 7mo ago
I think this is just the nature of a nondeterministic system; occasionally you're gonna be unlucky enough to encounter the leftmost segment of the bell curve. In my experience dumping a summary + starting a fresh session helps in these
105.
by xvector 7mo ago
> why isn’t supply chain risk the proper designation Because you can't designate a company a SCR because you don't like the contract you signed with them.
106.
by xvector 7mo ago
Even the poorest people have a state ID or drivers license. You cannot get most jobs without some legal ID.
107.
by xvector 7mo ago
You mean their signed and finalized contract was being violated and they started discussions about how violating said contract is not okay?
108.
by xvector 7mo ago
You seem awfully excited by the idea of the government performing domestic mass surveillance
109.
by xvector 7mo ago
Actually Anthropic is just refusing to renegotiate a contract. If the DoW cared so much about these restrictions, they shouldn't have signed the contract. Attempting to mike the company is childish behavior that will be stopped in cour
110.
by xvector 7mo ago
You certainly seem to support the government designating a company a SCR at gunpoint when they refuse to renegotiate a signed, agreed to, and finalized contract.
111.
by xvector 7mo ago
You haven't provided any evidence for why you think AI is capable of performing a fully autonomous kill chain without civilian casualties today. You are just raging about how people here "hate the president" and "don&#x2
112.
by xvector 7mo ago
> It's them killing islamic terrorists trying to commit genocide on people celebrating at a Christmas parade. You are woefully unfamiliar with the state of AI today. Top models frequently fail to write working code, often provide no
113.
by xvector 7mo ago
Deals are totally different, OAI allows "all lawful use" (so basically anything)
114.
by xvector 7mo ago
In your example, the model flags innocent people to be killed. Anthropic does not have a problem with using AI in totally autonomous (no human in the loop) kill chains They have a problem with doing it with today's models , because to
115.
by xvector 7mo ago
A far better headline would be "United Airlines says it will boot passengers who play content out loud". But NBC gotta get those advertising clicks I guess.
116.
by xvector 7mo ago
To be fair, common law and the current system are totally fucking dumb. Everyone that has come up with it and perpetuates it should be ashamed of themselves.
117.
by xvector 7mo ago
Really not sure how you can reconcile that with them making decisions that got them designated a SCR.
118.
by xvector 7mo ago
Only for work directly on government contracts, 99% of work is unaffected
119.
by xvector 7mo ago
You are 100% incorrect, only direct contract work is affected
120.
by xvector 7mo ago
They'll be fine, recruiters don't look this stuff up and generally background checks only care about illegal shit.

More ›