Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
xvector
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
29 ms
·
481.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
So basically the permissions you need to make competent wearable AR glasses interop with your smartphone.
482.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
Even if the certs were properly cryptographically vetted, you could just point the camera at a high-enough resolution screen displaying false content.
483.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
Do you think China will stop here? This is like trying to hide Photoshop from the public. Realistic AI generated videos and adversary-sponsored mass disinformation campaigns are 100% inevitable, even if the US labs stopped working on it tod
484.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
Eh, growing pains.
485.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
> Why is everyone so confident it will just keep getting better? Because there are literally thousands of avenues to explore and we've only just begun with the lowest of low hanging fruit.
486.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
There's no evidence that this fearmongering over safety is actually correct. The worst thing you can do is pummel an emerging technology into the grave because of misplaced fear. Just take a look at how many everyday things were "
487.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
That world is already here. Nothing you can do about it, might as well democratize access to the technology.
488.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
The problem is they compromised on both fronts (privacy, compute) and produced something that is ultimately a useless joke. They could have produced something that was good and required accepting a privacy disclaimer to use. Or they could h
489.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
There are ≤3B models far better than the absolute garbage Apple is running on the iPhone.
490.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
Agree, I'm hugely bullish on AI but this implementation is just so fucking bad. The Apple execs involved should feel a deep sense of shame and incompetence. What a joke. The Siri org leaders have proven to the world, time and time ag
491.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
Metapost - Reading the (civilized!) comments on HN vs those on Reddit is such a contrast. I'm a bit worried that while regulators are focusing on X/Facebook/Instagram/etc. from a moderation perspective, not one regulato
492.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
> How about a tiny bit of responsibility for the startup bros who just flung this thing out into the world without proper safety checks? What more "safety checks" do you want? The output is censored, there are warnings all over
493.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
Illegal content, perhaps. I don't know. But what I do know is that the line definitely shouldn't be drawn at porn, alcohol, or immature AI chatbots.
494.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
Parenting still needs to happen, especially if your 17-year old child is autistic as was the case in this article - they do not have the maturity of a typical 17-year old.
495.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
This is a bunch of hand-wringing. If the AI reply is what I would have said anyways; awesome! Finding thumbnails is hard, but if AI comes up with a good one? Fantastic! None of your interactions except the ones with your friends and family
496.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
No, because I don't agree with the government controlling what I can watch. There is a cost to freedom. I don't need a nanny state to live a full life.
497.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
Should porn sites shut down because "children using [the] service is reliably and consistently resulting in negative outcomes for the children and their families"?
498.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
There should absolutely be a Section 230 for AI outputs. Parents should actually parent if they don't want their kid using certain apps and websites. The app was 17+ and if the parents did the bare minimum with parental controls it wou
499.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
I think it's also entirely reasonable to expect parents to actually parent, instead of installing foam bumpers and a nanny state everywhere in case some kid hurts themselves. If the parents weren't absent and actually used parenta
500.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
c.ai is explicitly a 17+ app and has multiple warnings at literally every stage of chatting with a bot that "this is a bot, don't take it seriously." Maybe the parents should actually parent. I'm sick of absent parents
501.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
I think the "silent majority" is just fine with this change. The OSS "extremists" will certainly be the noisiest about this - everyone else will continue on with life as usual, especially if they have an understanding of
502.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
For $32k? Yikes! That's like a $150 mass-produced movement.
503.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
I own a few bespoke meteorite artpieces and my biggest concern with something like this is the smell! Muonionalusta meteorite in my experience has this pungent, sulfur-like smell. I see nothing about the movement and suspect it's an o
504.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
Right, and in the meantime nuclear-armed countries mostly get to avoid the horrible, endless churn of death and war and teenagers being sent off to the meat grinder to push some border here or some border there. We have eliminated warfare b
505.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
A company and a country made a legal, consensual agreement (that the Irish public was also in favor of) and the EU stepped in and "re-interpreted" it to rent-seek. This is transparent and obvious to everyone outside of the EU. Ren
506.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
> for some reason Apple seems to manage just fine (with GDPR). Just fine? Like the EU forcing Apple to pay $14B in back taxes after voiding a legal and consensual tax agreement between Apple and Ireland? [1] Or the DMA resulting in an a
507.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
> I wonder how all those European companies are doing it. Carefully crafted/gerrymandered laws that only rent seek from American big tech. > You say this all the time, yet we're doing fine. How come? You're not doing fi
508.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
https://stable-diffusion-art.com/animatediff/
509.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
Eh, society did a pretty good job overall. The bomb was the end of conventional warfare between nuclear nations. MAD has created an era of peace unlike anything our species has ever seen before.
510.
▲
by
xvector
2y ago
This website is not a tool - not really. Your keyboard is. Censoring AI generation itself is very much like censoring your keyboard or text editor or IDE. Edit: Of course, "literally everything is a tool", yada yada. You get what
More ›