Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
xmddmx
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
xmddmx
4y ago
> It's used for other things like screen sharing Intersting! Starting a few weeks ago, I was screen sharing from a Monterey macbook to a Ventura Beta MacBook, using drag & drop to copy an app over for testing. Both macs were on
62.
▲
by
xmddmx
4y ago
Many small business routers and firewalls still don't have reasonable IPv6 support, for example https://forum.peplink.com/t/ipv6-support/3675/54 (from 2015) says they are working on it. People are aski
63.
▲
by
xmddmx
4y ago
This article was written in 2015, not 1960 is why. Academic psychological research has been making great attempts to remove biased / inaccurate terms from the lexicon, and I encourage you to find a cite from the last 10 years that uses
64.
▲
by
xmddmx
4y ago
In context, it's top-down vs. bottom-up: Theory driven: "I think anxiety and depression are fundamentaly different, because of writings of Freud, Foo, and Bar" Empirical: factor analysis of test data suggests anxiety and depr
65.
▲
by
xmddmx
4y ago
Counterpoint: there are four families of Dopamine receptors https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dopamine_receptor and 7 families of Serotonin receptors: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5-HT_receptor and
66.
▲
by
xmddmx
4y ago
I canceled my APA membership over this. People asked APA to condemn it and they did not. Weak sauce on my part (to just cancel) but yeah, that was not cool.
67.
▲
by
xmddmx
4y ago
"modern and liberal claim" It feels like you didn't read or understand the article. Techincal fields (other than yours) also have rules for how to use techincal terms. Arguing for clarity is not a "liberal" point of
68.
▲
by
xmddmx
4y ago
"Psych PhDs generally don't do frontline stuff" Ok, to be fair, I did roll my eyes at a few of their terms. However, you are mostly arguing out of scope/training. Psychiatrists are not researchers, they are MDs. They ar
69.
▲
by
xmddmx
4y ago
I think the aritcle is pretty good (I have a strong disiagreement with one of the 50 terms, but otherwise I think they did a good job). I'm relatively new here at HN, but as a psychologist (who also dabbles in hacking) some of the reac
70.
▲
by
xmddmx
4y ago
You are correct - this is terrible advice. The main issue is that the word "significance" is overloaded with two meanings in research & stats: "Large and important" (e.g. "clinical significance", often give
71.
▲
by
xmddmx
4y ago
Semantic Versioning with numbers > 9 really breaks my brain sometimes - I read the headline as "Python 3.1.1 is faster than 3.8" - a performance regression - and thought "Oh no!"
72.
▲
by
xmddmx
4y ago
Sometimes I still want to see the LED. In this situation, I use blue painters tape, and keep adding layers until the LED is at a reasonable level. You really need to check this in a completely dark room to get it right.
73.
▲
by
xmddmx
4y ago
"I made my calendar louder to check my phone less. It vibrates like an alarm until I get to it. " macOS and iOS user here - how do you configure that? I find that Calendar reminders are not loud enough (they give a single notifica
74.
▲
by
xmddmx
4y ago
Negative Reinforcement ≠ Punishment. This is a common mistake. Negative Reinforcement is the removal of an adverse stimuli. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reinforcement#Negative_reinfor...
75.
▲
WTF happened to the Web? (Simpsons avatar creator edition)
2 points
by
xmddmx
4y ago
|
1 comments
76.
▲
by
xmddmx
4y ago
OK, but I think if you announce "super good quality" or similar, people are going to zoom in and look at your pictures. Artifacts should be explained to head off confusion?
77.
▲
by
xmddmx
4y ago
Interesting - when I zoom in (to the 'detail' box) it looks very striated : i'm seeing what appears to be some sort of 45 degree diagnoal scanning procedure. Is this from the source or some sort of artifact of PNG? (zoom i
78.
▲
by
xmddmx
4y ago
Ok great, but is there any way to click to see a high resolution image? The website design seems to prevent this.
79.
▲
by
xmddmx
5y ago
A classic experiment, Shepard and Metzler (1971), Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1731476
80.
▲
by
xmddmx
5y ago
I absolutely love my Magic Mouse 1 and 2, but they were clearly from the era of "this is how it has to be done, you must learn the way" - which was true of so many Apple products. For me, I worked hard at getting used to the MM,
81.
▲
by
xmddmx
5y ago
It also failed DKIM signature validation for me on several accounts, but when I cross-checked vs. http://mail-tester.com it worked fine. I think there's a bug in https://www.learndmarc.com