Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
xcvd
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
xcvd
16y ago
What would you prefer? Thousands of apps approved by "a small team in California", which are generally spyware free. OR a handful of apps specifically designed for your platform.
2.
▲
by
xcvd
16y ago
Doesn't work in FF 3.6? Looking at the actual Google page, the fonts don't load.
3.
▲
by
xcvd
16y ago
I don't see any details about pricing. Feels bad giving away all my details before I even know how much I'd need to pay.
4.
▲
by
xcvd
16y ago
Feels dodgy Why would I submit my personal details before knowing all the other steps?
5.
▲
by
xcvd
16y ago
Yes. Have fun playing with the open source code to the Google Maps app. Or the Mail app. Or the source code to the Market. Or removing all the vendor spamware. Really. This article overlooks things. Also.... and this is a big one...... owni
6.
▲
by
xcvd
16y ago
This article has been taken down? Even if Apple has muscled in, Slate must not have any strength in their convictions/gossiping.
7.
▲
by
xcvd
16y ago
My point is.... Yes, ship in four weeks, but ship to modern browsers with an elegant html5-only decision Old browsers can have a single, basic file input.
8.
▲
by
xcvd
16y ago
No, I genuinely would prefer the browser natively handle file transfers rather than relying on old browser plugins and lots of hacks to get old browsers to work
9.
▲
by
xcvd
16y ago
Complexity. Dropping back to native is thinking about the future rather than supporting the past with tired hacks and stupid browser plugins.
10.
▲
by
xcvd
16y ago
As mentioned below, this seems very good http://valums.com/ajax-upload/ I'd be more comfortable styling this to fit my needs than a forced fully blown gizmo
11.
▲
by
xcvd
16y ago
Thanks! I like the ajax upload.... very simple fancyupload uses flash.... unless you are Facebook or a government website, I'd avoid all that fancy stuff and keep it simple for the future!
12.
▲
by
xcvd
16y ago
I mean, screw supporting old browsers Given them a basic, single file uploaded with no fancy A clean HTML5 implementation, with nice features, is more valued
13.
▲
by
xcvd
16y ago
I'm frustrated that in this day and age this is the best solution people recommend. Are there any elegant HTML5 multiple file uploaders out there with drag and drop? That, and direct S3 upload, is the Holy Grail for me.