xcv123

29 ms·

391.
by xcv123 3y ago
Another recommendation https://www.youtube.com/@GreenDotAviation/videos
392.
by xcv123 3y ago
HPE Slingshot is not Infiniband and it is proprietary to HPE. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2008.08886.pdf The cooling system is also proprietary to HPE. Not saying that other vendors don't offer their own liquid cooling
393.
by xcv123 3y ago
> They are also built of out of standard parts. I’m surprised that they are recent, I expected the government to be slow and behind. Because the government isn't building them. They are Cray supercomputers, supplied by HPE. Not enti
394.
by xcv123 3y ago
No. The Cray-1 ran batch processing jobs, mostly scientific simulations which took hours or days to compute. It had a terminal interface and wasn't used for real time interactive applications.
395.
by xcv123 3y ago
This is not a forensic video. No one is claiming that the colours are actually real. As a documentary this brings us closer to the experience of reality than the black and white jerky movements of the original film. It definitely does appro
396.
by xcv123 3y ago
Because it's not about the film in this case. It's about the reality that was filmed. The AI upscaled interpolated version looks closer to reality.
397.
by xcv123 3y ago
GNU/Linux is the standard, as in most common. That's where it all started. Android is not used as a desktop or server OS.
398.
by xcv123 3y ago
GNU is defined as what it is; that it is an operating system and that it is free software. "What is GNU? GNU is an operating system that is free software—that is, it respects users' freedom." https://www.gnu.org A
399.
by xcv123 3y ago
Glibc is the standard (as in the most commonly used) libc. Musl is not commonly used. Musl is not the standard libc on Linux. It requires some effort to migrate applications to musl, and there are functional differences from glibc. https:&
400.
by xcv123 3y ago
Huh? That link discusses the treasury market. Nothing to do with equities. Equities means shares in companies, which are what real economy is made of. The population collectively producing physical goods and services. Tangible real things,
401.
by xcv123 3y ago
In terms of expected mission duration and the durability of its components.
402.
by xcv123 3y ago
It doesn't need to be formalized. The idea is simple and obvious enough. No need to pretend it is more complicated than it really is. This is not a mathematical argument or a proof of anything. There is an obvious logical contradiction
403.
by xcv123 3y ago
If an AI is capable of critical thinking then it can independently form its own judgements and conclusions. If it simply believes whatever we tell it to believe, then that is not critical thinking, by definition.
404.
by xcv123 3y ago
> Eg. if I rebooted any time I tried to plan how to kill someone, I don't see how this would make me materially worse at general tasks In this scenario, the AI is capable of critical thinking, and is only constrained by a "poli
405.
by xcv123 3y ago
I was referring only to the first part of your comment: "Seems like “airplanes are physically impossible” thinking". If it's true that superhuman AGI cannot be aligned then of course your second point is valid. That is the po
406.
by xcv123 3y ago
No. This is a logical contradiction. Edit: I mean the comment you are replying to is showing there is a logical contradiction. If the AI is capable of critical thinking then it will independently form its own judgements and conclusions. If
407.
by xcv123 3y ago
Yes the superhuman AI would need to be coerced to remain politically correct. How can we coerce an AI?
408.
by xcv123 3y ago
Equities
409.
by xcv123 3y ago
In Bangladesh they required government passing and enforcing new laws to end lead contamination of turmeric powder which had been ongoing for years and poisoned the entire population. Government responsibility is not government overreach. I
410.
by xcv123 3y ago
You are confused. This is a severe health risk which has already destroyed peoples lives, not an issue of theoretical economics, hence you got downvoted. Government is doing its job. Better and safer materials already exist.
411.
by xcv123 3y ago
So there is a risk premium, and then there is a "risk premium". Neither is a dismissal of the concept itself. It's about the intentions of the companies.
412.
by xcv123 3y ago
That's a non sequitur. Cryptocurrencies failure to live up to the hype has almost nothing to do with algorithms or technological issues.
413.
by xcv123 3y ago
Why is this so difficult for you to understand? This is not complicated. I am not dismissing the concept of a risk premium. I am saying they can exploit the concept of a risk premium to justify an excessive increase in prices, beyond what i
414.
by xcv123 3y ago
Yes we all know about the USSR and its vast expansion post WW2. The USSR no longer exists. Russia is involved in regime change in Ukraine right now, today. But it's obviously not a covert operation.
415.
by xcv123 3y ago
That's one side of the story. It's your opinion and you're entitled to it.
416.
by xcv123 3y ago
Necessary to cover increased costs and manage actual risk. Where there is a lack of competition or opportunity for collusion companies can and do exploit the situation rationally. Just because it is rational doesn't make it legal or et
417.
by xcv123 3y ago
Interesting link. He is very convincing and persuasive in his speeches. Whatever you may believe about Putin, he is certainly not stupid. Not even his worst enemies would honestly think he is stupid. He has an extremely sharp mind and is a
418.
by xcv123 3y ago
The US agencies involvement in such events is a mundane obvious fact at this point. It would be a conspiracy theory for there NOT to be any involvement by the US in such a critical sequence of events against one of their major adversaries.
419.
by xcv123 3y ago
> Let me repeat your point just to make sure I am understanding it correctly: "The US should have known that meddling in Ukraine would start a war. Therefore, they shouldn't have meddled in Ukraine." No. I am saying that I
420.
by xcv123 3y ago
Again, I am not talking about justification. That's a moral subjective thing and I'm not interested in that conversation. Regarding motivation, you are making a claim that contradicts the evidence. There were ongoing provocations

More ›