3 ms·
Because it's not about the film in this case. It's about the reality that was filmed. The AI upscaled interpolated version looks closer to reality.
by xcv123 3y ago
Because it's not about the film in this case. It's about the reality that was filmed. The AI upscaled interpolated version looks closer to reality.
- Applejinx 3y agoA key point about this, whether here or in AI restoration of classic audio from yesteryear or indeed AI restoration to use in court as forensic audio or video… It ain't. It's made up, synthesized in a sophisticated way to become what is normally present in such a context. As such it is by definition fake and not reality, but a sort of consensus opinion of what usually goes into any given spot. You are not even approaching reality. You're approaching what is typically expected, synthesized to most plausibly fill in the gap. If there is some unusual detail in the original media, the restoration will read it as damage or a glitch, and will wrest it from you and force it into a more predictable form.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- xcv123 3y agoThis is not a forensic video. No one is claiming that the colours are actually real. As a documentary this brings us closer to the experience of reality than the black and white jerky movements of the original film. It definitely does approach reality. Grass is green, not grey. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHHt-CBKkS0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHHt-CBKkS0