xbp

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by xbp 5y ago

   > Code reviews have same power to rectify both: naming and comment issues. Great point.. except for when you're dealing with a lead and/or reviewer that refuses to approve comments because "we write self-documenting code&q
2. 2.▲
   by xbp 5y ago

   > The laws and regulations they pass are directly contributing to homelessness and lack of housing. v misleading esp w/ language such as 'likely' and 'most socialist' w/ zero sources.
3. 3.▲
   by xbp 5y ago

   > Scientists have spend enormous amount of time and effort studying animal communication and behavior and it mostly contradicts what you believe. Source? Plus how does the amount of time spent studying something matter? What if they&#x27
4. 4.▲
   by xbp 5y ago

   > working on a project that does pretty much the same kind of thing they're doing Radon outlined why this isn't true. [1] > basically spreading some of that knowledge you gave them and making it packaged and accessible not o
5. 5.▲
   by xbp 5y ago

   Appalling and completely unacceptable behavior from a company so committed to being a conduit for open-source innovation. Slightly unrelated: I used to shamelessly promote repl.it a couple years ago, but no longer do because their app has
6. 6.▲
   by xbp 5y ago

   nit: please refrain from any ad hominem comments and instead comment on the merits of the content itself