xaedes

41 ms·

1. 331.▲
   by xaedes 8y ago

   Okay. I am going to say it here : Voldemort. Also they are just working the euphemism treadmill
2. 332.▲
   by xaedes 8y ago

   How do you improve communication issues when you discover them? For example suppose you encounter documentation by word documents in windows shared drive and an set up but not really used confluence (so we don't need to think in this e
3. 333.▲
   by xaedes 8y ago

   But what are the results?
4. 334.▲
   by xaedes 8y ago

   We call it a comedy when it _intends_ to make people laugh. Just because _you_ laugh about it, doesn't mean that it also intends this. I know you could now say that they actually intend it. But I doubt that. (X)
5. 335.▲
   by xaedes 8y ago

   1) You can't do everything. Even when you COULD do each single thing there is only so much time. Saying "no" is important to get things done. 2) The world is absolutely unfinished. Really I sometimes wonder why everything not
6. 336.▲
   by xaedes 8y ago

   Did they "fix" it? This is what I get as now: Aristo is not sure about this one... Aristo's best guess: (B) women Confidence: 10.38% as computed from these reasoners: Topic Matching: 85.98% MORE INFO Topic: flourish
7. 337.▲
   by xaedes 8y ago

   I can not recall all the details of all conversations and all that happens. A lot of my life gets "blackouted" after a while. I mean yea I may can remember what I did last night _now_. But after a few days or weeks or whatever tim
8. 338.▲
   by xaedes 8y ago

   I read about this a while ago. There was mentioned that this Void may be to to make the Grand Gallery more stable by putting less weight on it.
9. 339.▲
   by xaedes 8y ago

   What kind of food do they like? I also want to do that. I look at and whistle with the birds in my town for quite a while, but I am not sure what would be good food to carry around for them.
10. 340.▲
    by xaedes 8y ago

    Interesting read. Reminds me of "The cognitive life of things"
11. 341.▲
    by xaedes 8y ago

    In the first example there really _could_ be sheeps, or at least goats. They could cover there quite well. Like in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0izxifsh0MU
12. 342.▲
    by xaedes 8y ago

    Mnnn... Light gray text on white background, so hard to read
13. 343.▲
    by xaedes 8y ago

    Any source or keywords to look for this?
14. 344.▲
    by xaedes 8y ago

    Depends, lets say 2. Math. Is it access to a real realm of reality or just a bunch of tools to help us make it in the world? Yea thats a good question. Looks like a question where my answer is probably "both".
15. 345.▲
    by xaedes 8y ago

    I think it means ego is just a label for a thing in the world. What exist itself is the truth. Not the label. The call for a try to define ego as a precise as possible ("as a mathematician") and in the sibling post from use
16. 346.▲
    by xaedes 8y ago

    Edit: It should mean: "the interface isN'T extremely polished". Not the opposite. Messed up my last edit and didn't see the mistake until now, sry^^
17. 347.▲
    by xaedes 8y ago

    Cool! I had a similar topic for my master thesis where I predict GNSS Shadowing and HDOP Maps to plan HDOP optimal routes. Here is a working implementation to do GNSS shadowing with GPS, Galileo, and Glonass using OpenstreetMap 3D Export of
18. 348.▲
    by xaedes 9y ago

    Well.. He did look uneasy when asked about Palantir.
19. 349.▲
    by xaedes 9y ago

    "Conclusion We’ve seen how to represent the game of 2048 as a Markov Decision Process and obtained provably optimal policies for the smaller games on the 2x2 and 3x3 boards and a partial game on the 4x4 board. The methods used here req
20. 350.▲
    by xaedes 9y ago

    Took me a while to realize playing "optimal" means in this case playing optimal according to their chosen reward scheme. Not optimal in the sense of optimal strategy to play 2048 at all which the title can suggest. Anyway, nice so
21. 351.▲
    by xaedes 9y ago

    What that means for software development? I hope the lazy excuses to NOT write performant software will die out and software gets fast again. remove the hundreds layers of libraries and frameworks and build good fast software again. we wil
22. 352.▲
    by xaedes 9y ago

    There is no need for the simulated time to be equally "fast" (whatever THAT means) as fhe real one. it is annoying and impractical for us observing the simulation from the outside, but it wouldn't make any difference from the
23. 353.▲
    I am burning bridges. Watch me play with fire(agileleanlife.com)

    1 points by xaedes 9y ago|0 comments
24. 354.▲
    by xaedes 9y ago

    Refactorings can safe future heat losses by enabling easier maintainance and extensibility.
25. 355.▲
    by xaedes 9y ago

    I totally see it your way, that conscious experiences are just (internal) behaviour. But I don't think that conscious experience itself creates the model of itself and the rest. It merely views or recalls or traverses it. It certainly
26. 356.▲
    by xaedes 9y ago

    It can be seen in this light: Your experience and your thoughts are internal behaviour.
27. 357.▲
    You Are Most Likely to Die at 11 A.m(theatlantic.com)

    4 points by xaedes 9y ago|0 comments
28. 358.▲
    by xaedes 9y ago

    It would be very intersting to see an analysis of the evolution over time of those claims.
29. 359.▲
    by xaedes 9y ago

    Another related post that was once on HN front: Mental Models I Find Repeatedly Useful https://medium.com/@yegg/mental-models-i-find-repeatedly-use...
30. 360.▲
    by xaedes 9y ago

    linear model