x86x87

14 ms·

151.
by x86x87 3y ago
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/intelligence the ability to apply knowledge to manipulate one's environment or to think abstractly as measured by objective criteria (such as tests) Manipulating the envi
152.
by x86x87 3y ago
Boy, we must have a totally different understanding of whay AGI is. Intelligence is not about parroting an answer you've seen before. It's about using your environment to gain an evolutionary advantage.
153.
by x86x87 3y ago
I mean, it is IBM. From my experience working there you either have really young people that are just at the beginning of their careers or lifers who know and exploit the system inside out
154.
by x86x87 3y ago
Agree. That's what I get for not having a D element on the direct path :)
155.
by x86x87 3y ago
Maybe you need a controller for how you interact over here? Nobody was insinuating anything. I was pointing out that going past an intuitive understanding may be a harder leap than expected.
156.
by x86x87 3y ago
yup. i get it. it's a steep learning curve. and it's hard to grok if you don't understand what the theory behind them is. My bigger point is that the articles like the one linked here just barely scratch the surface and you c
157.
by x86x87 3y ago
Lol. There is an entire field dedicated to this question. It's called Automatic Control. Yes, you can do all of the above. You need to model it with a multivariable system. Google control systems and systems theory. Usually in a physic
158.
by x86x87 3y ago
I don't understand the division part. Everyone should record interactions with HR under these circumstances
159.
by x86x87 3y ago
in case of bloat most features are not used. you spend almost all your time and attention maintaining shit nobody cares about
160.
SB 5924 Concerning access to personnel records(app.leg.wa.gov)
1 points by x86x87 3y ago|0 comments
161.
by x86x87 3y ago
Yes. This is nuts (in a good way). I remember the first time I saw the video on youtube and the author was going through how he's going to do this with only printable chatacter and i had a "no fucking way" moment followed by
162.
by x86x87 3y ago
It's not about killing experiments. It's about things that were advertised as the next big thing with fanfare to not be properly maintained and eventually killed even though they had a lot of users. That's the problem.
163.
by x86x87 3y ago
brandolini's law
164.
by x86x87 3y ago
There are already L2 solutions like the Lightning Network.
165.
by x86x87 3y ago
Opinions are maybe somewhat mixed on RTO. What is not mixed is the fact that the reasons given for RTO were pure bullshit. People will never forget the bs they were subjected to. god help amazon when the market recovers and nobody will want
166.
by x86x87 3y ago
Q is shit. Everyone and their dog is doing genAI. We will look back at this in 5 years and have a good laugh about "ai"
167.
by x86x87 3y ago
Classic. When the free soda goes things are about to go down.
168.
by x86x87 3y ago
+1000 if in the morning I dread leaving the car and walking in the office it's time to go. I shouldn't be excited like a dumbass all the time about the work I do but I should at a minimum not dread going into the office.
169.
by x86x87 3y ago
People are delusional _or_ you don't get it _or_ the truth is somewhere in between
170.
by x86x87 3y ago
I should save this and come back to it in 10 years.
171.
by x86x87 3y ago
I mean, if they are not doing it in good faith no matter what happens is going to be half assed.
172.
by x86x87 3y ago
Let me ask this: assuming they did not tighten the bolts correctly and qa didn't check it, what are the odds they keep an accurate paper trail?
173.
by x86x87 3y ago
You claim that I cannot make generalizations based solely on "sentiment" and you go ahead and do yoyr own generalizations. Back on Earth, if there is a reduced set a people that can do a job and the demand for that job greatly out
174.
by x86x87 3y ago
Look. Nobody is going to pay you more than they have to. I understand that for you, maybe, entry level software development is "not that hard". For most people out there it's hard as fuck. Overworking people is the norm in th
175.
by x86x87 3y ago
Lol. Are you serious? First, you conveniently ignore COL which matters a lot. Doesn't matter how much money you make if you spend most of it on rent and food. Second, I don't think you really appreciate the cognitive toll software
176.
by x86x87 3y ago
Do you want stocks in companies that are profitable but do so at the expense of their own future?
177.
by x86x87 3y ago
For 2: we still have a severe labor demand deficit. Software will continue to eat the world. What we are seeing here is corporation shortsightedness and greed. You can make a killing in a quarter by firing all your workers. You won't b
178.
by x86x87 3y ago
I was half expecting someone to model this in VHDL and to synthesize it in a FPGA to get the answer to part 2
179.
by x86x87 3y ago
Yes and let's call the generated output what is: bullshit. Now add https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandolini's_law
180.
by x86x87 3y ago
who is liable in case of a self-driving car causes an accident? Is the liability any different between an accident and a potential accident (ie ticket) ? I for one do not buy the argument that the intent to break the law is not there. To un

More ›