wvlia5

19 ms·

181.
by wvlia5 7y ago
I'm referring to transducers as in clojure. You can compose 2 'map' transducers, and that results in a single 'map' of the composed mapping-functions. That's to say that the two expressions you wrote would resu
182.
by wvlia5 7y ago
Sounds like you are in need of transducers
183.
by wvlia5 7y ago
The compiler for the B language, by Arthur Withney http://kparc.com/b/
184.
by wvlia5 7y ago
What is 'algebraic' about algebraic effects?
185.
by wvlia5 7y ago
Stay tuned for updates
186.
Show HN: Intriguing Python One-Liner(gist.github.com)
8 points by wvlia5 7y ago|3 comments
187.
by wvlia5 7y ago
Run this python jewel: exec(''.join(chr(int(''.join(str(ord(i)-8203)for i in c),2))for c in '
188.
by wvlia5 7y ago
Got ya
189.
by wvlia5 7y ago
try it out, no spoilers :p
190.
by wvlia5 7y ago
could you give this a try? exec(''.join(chr(int(''.join(str(ord(i)-8203)for i in c),2))for c in '
191.
by wvlia5 7y ago
This python program is amazing: exec(''.join(chr(int(''.join(str(ord(i)-8203)for i in c),2))for c in '
192.
Show HN: Python One-Liner(gist.github.com)
2 points by wvlia5 7y ago|4 comments
193.
by wvlia5 8y ago
Ok, so by that same rationale we could say: "Evil or not is irrelevant, but if you don't like animal-exploiters action, you have to force them to stop regardless"
194.
by wvlia5 8y ago
I understand that, I'm pointing out that your drawing a line separating human vs non human is just as arbitrary as drawing a line separating white vs non white
195.
by wvlia5 8y ago
Sure there is, but in your view we couldn't say that those people are evil, because in the end it's just preference of where to draw the line, correct? Nazis chose to draw a line excluding jews, and that was their preference
196.
by wvlia5 8y ago
So you would be OK with me killing black people then, just preference
197.
by wvlia5 8y ago
Isn't that kind of arbitrary? What if I said "for me, I drew the line at white people and non white people. I'm okay to do anything to non white"
198.
by wvlia5 8y ago
That semi-automatic AI seems like a useful product as well, for a different task
199.
Ask HN: Good Name for a New Programming Language?
1 points by wvlia5 8y ago|1 comments
200.
Truth about Women in IT(m.youtube.com)
1 points by wvlia5 8y ago|0 comments
201.
Ask HN: How do we prevent software fragmentation/divergence?
2 points by wvlia5 8y ago|3 comments
202.
by wvlia5 8y ago
Lol, how creative! I'll try to mail you if I find the time :)
203.
by wvlia5 8y ago
"that means you're not really getting any information if the beam balances" Wrong. If it was true, that would imply that the probability of it balancing is 1, since the information you get is -log2(probability). Obviously the
204.
by wvlia5 8y ago
Wrong. You don't know which side will be heavier
205.
Listen the oldest song known (100 AD)(en.wikipedia.org)
1 points by wvlia5 8y ago|0 comments
206.
We need one of these for programming(artlebedev.com)
2 points by wvlia5 8y ago|0 comments
207.
Simple explanation of Monads(gist.github.com)
2 points by wvlia5 8y ago|0 comments
208.
by wvlia5 8y ago
Yes I know, but I've heard some clojurists criticizing racket because of its data structures. So perhaps that would outweigh its benefits. Thanks for your opinion
209.
by wvlia5 8y ago
I have little knowledge of lisps, but I'd like to implement a new language in one of them. What would be a better choice, racket or clojure?
210.
by wvlia5 9y ago
How can an offer be useful for getting hired by another company? I don't get it

More ›