3 ms·
I'm referring to transducers as in clojure. You can compose 2 'map' transducers, and that results in a single 'map' of the composed mapping-functions. That's to
by wvlia5 7y ago
I'm referring to transducers as in clojure. You can compose 2 'map' transducers, and that results in a single 'map' of the composed mapping-functions. That's to say that the two expressions you wrote would result in the same computations if you expressed them in terms of transducers.
- tempguy9999 7y ago5 mins looking at https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26317325/can-someone-explain-clojure-transducers-to-me-in-simple-terms https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26317325/can-someone-exp... I think I'm getting it. Ops accumulated and composed until they actually have to be evaluated. That's very interesting indeed, thanks, and I'll spend a couple of hours on it. However, I was using my my example exactly as an example; I was after a symbolic manips app. The issue of the cost of naively compiled functional languages matters to me as bad performance will kill a good thing.