wulfklaue

5 ms·

1.
by wulfklaue 5y ago
* Limited IO * Max 16GB Memory ( at unjustified cost ) * Limited Multi monitor support * No eGPU support ( as of now ) * Only about 50 a 55% of all the software is M1 ready ( looking at some tracking sites ). Technically this is not a M1 fl
2.
by wulfklaue 6y ago
The EU is introducing legal laws that will combat planned obsolescence. And that protect the right to repair. The EU is also fed up with manufactures thinking they can get away with everything. Those laws will also have a effect across the
3.
by wulfklaue 6y ago
> IDEs such as IntelliJ can easily consume 8GB of memory Sound more like a Jetbrain ( IntelliJ company ) problem. Used to develop on PHPstorm ( another Jetbrain ) product ( same software in the background ) and the slow startup's, 2
4.
by wulfklaue 6y ago
> I'm honestly for the first time in a decade a bit excited about an upcoming computer, I think we are more excited about a shake up in the whole computer world, that may mean the dead of ATX/MB's/etc as we know it. A
5.
by wulfklaue 6y ago
Plenty move advantages then just round trip latency. The fact that its a single SOC, what in turn reduces traces on the MB. Freeing up real-estate. We are finally moving to the conversion point between smartphone's and PCs. It has been
6.
by wulfklaue 8y ago
I am not the author of the Twitter post. The mentioned post shows the results after switching from Ruby + Sinatra over to Crystal + Kemal. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DabQrScW4AAycuC.jpg:large https://pb
7.
Going from 735ms on Ruby to 15ms on Crystal(twitter.com)
7 points by wulfklaue 8y ago|1 comments
8.
Crystal 0.24.1 released(github.com)
87 points by wulfklaue 9y ago|22 comments
9.
by wulfklaue 9y ago
/Looks at price... Gets you 11 Pi's ... Gets you only 1 Intel CPU, no memory, motherboard, heatsink, fans. Reminds me of the Celeron® Processor J3455... 10W rating on Intel there page. On AVERAGE! Then when you see the real power
10.
by wulfklaue 9y ago
So simply use the free "freepascal / lazarus". You wallet will thank you later. :)
11.
by wulfklaue 9y ago
> So, apparently you didn't even read the article, as it is explicitly stated that this was not the intention or direction of Swift. It might actually help that there is a real commitment in that direction. The issue being that it w
12.
Life in the Fast Lane – using D without the GC(dlang.org)
3 points by wulfklaue 9y ago|0 comments
13.
C++Now 2017: Competitive Advantage with D(youtube.com)
8 points by wulfklaue 9y ago|1 comments
14.
by wulfklaue 9y ago
Good luck on seeing D on that site. There seems to be a active war between the sites maintainer and D. There used to be D benchmarks on the old site and people tries to release new code to the site, but for some reason the current maintaine
15.
by wulfklaue 9y ago
It was my impression that CoreRT work was put on the back burner ( not on hold ) so the team was able to focus on Core 2.0 release. Theoretically the team can move more resources to CoreRT as Core 2.0 is now in preview. There was some talk
16.
by wulfklaue 9y ago
D is a good C++ replacement language. But it needs more community support. Its advised to develop in DMD compiler and only compile the release code in LDC/GCC as this can be twice or trippel as fast. Not saying that DMD is slow ( unles
17.
by wulfklaue 9y ago
Except that there are other languages like Go, Crystal, D, Nim that all offer memory safety ( thanks to there GC ), with a light GC ( like reference counting ). And based upon the same benchmarks that Rust in participates, they are close or