wredue

41 ms·

691.
by wredue 3y ago
As opposed to the 4 gig of ram and 128g of storage on the Chromebooks which cannot be upgraded that this is meant to compete with?
692.
by wredue 3y ago
Provincially run insurance and utilities traditionally keeps prices in check. Notably, when provincially run insurance and utilities have sold to private interests, the results have always been the same, even recent examples across Canada:
693.
by wredue 3y ago
Now wait till the forests burn and instead of being a carbon sink, they become a carbon contributor. Hi Canada!
694.
by wredue 3y ago
>big companies go to great lengths to ensure chain of trust lol.
695.
by wredue 3y ago
Your point is to insert noise in to a conversation that you have zero scientific background in. You’re not bringing up points that experts are failing to comprehend. You’re just trying to muddy the waters.
696.
by wredue 3y ago
lol. Shareholders are absolutely not “you and me”. Your couple Tesla shares doesn’t make you a “shareholder” as being discussed here. The shareholders that sue boards are shareholders who, if they sold, would disrupt share price notably.
697.
by wredue 3y ago
They actually don’t even care if it’s illegal. Businesses straight up killed a reporter with a car bomb a few years back. They don’t give a fuck. How many companies blatantly break the law only to pull some accounting magic to entirely avoi
698.
by wredue 3y ago
IBM severed most of their ancient technology off in to Kyndryl. They’re pretty much all cloud at this point.
699.
by wredue 3y ago
That’s a weird way to put it. Driving a gas car doesn’t make you pro-big oil. Most of us are beholden to market pressures and have no realistic option. Everyone still has to make their living, and they have to do it inside the elites constr
700.
by wredue 3y ago
Some 40% of the population is actively pro big oil and actively denies the carbon footprint causal links with climate change and warming. You think 20 years is enough for this reckoning? Honestly, I think they’re all going to get away with
701.
by wredue 3y ago
Nobody capable of finding exploitable issues is going to be deterred by being an app rather than a website. If their thought process on this is actually “security through obscurity”, then I would not go anywhere near this as it tells me imm
702.
by wredue 3y ago
>Trump represents republicans Maybe don’t have racist genocidal stances then? Trump wasn’t banned for being a republican. He was banned, ultimately, for Jan 6. In reality, Trump broke all those platforms rules on several occasions and wa
703.
by wredue 3y ago
Deadnaming is typically done to be a cunt, which is a whole lot different than published works not having your new name on it. Yours is not a remotely apt comparison of the situations.
704.
by wredue 3y ago
They are, however, free to stop you from pushing Nazi propaganda on their resources. I’m quite discouraged by this thread not being taken down despite the very obvious brigade of alt-right Nazi sympathizers pretending that being gay is the
705.
by wredue 3y ago
The new fees are “We are publicly traded companies and are failing to meet growth demands, and so are raising prices, because as we all know, not infinitely growing means you’re a failure of a company”
706.
by wredue 3y ago
“Open mindedness” does not mean to “treat all ideas as being on equal grounds” All it means is to listen. After you listen, if you judge that it’s clearly just some quack trying to Mark Seargant some people (this is clearly what’s happening
707.
by wredue 3y ago
Since when has personal risk ever stopped people from doing things, especially clearly mentally ill people.
708.
by wredue 3y ago
I really don’t give a fuck what random perpetual contrarians have to say. The biologists who study viruses say that it has markers of natural evolution with at least 2 hops from human back to animal back to human.
709.
by wredue 3y ago
Gay people just want to live their lives. Fascist genocidal maniacs want to kill everyone that disagrees with them, including the gays. Neat slippery slope you’ve crafted, but it doesn’t logically follow. You also can’t walk in to a crowded
710.
by wredue 3y ago
The only evidence I’ve seen is -some US agencies don’t outright reject it -labs around the world work on SARS viruses -early people said it may have leaks (and these people subsequently retracted those statements after research) -china And
711.
by wredue 3y ago
Freedom is speech protects people from retaliation by the government. It is not and was never meant to protect the infringing upon other people’s right to a good life. Do you have any more alt-right copy pasta bullshit to spread?
712.
by wredue 3y ago
people who optionally break the social contract by pushing hate and genocide as an agenda cannot be protected by the social contract. They are the ones who are breaking it. Not me. Therefore, they are the ones who are removing themselves fr
713.
by wredue 3y ago
I am 100% okay with deplatforming fascist genocidal maniacs spreading hate
714.
by wredue 3y ago
Suppressing people whose goal is to suppress is neither dangerous, nor hypocritical. It’s not “because they’re not politically aligned with me”. It is that they desire the genociding and enslavement of entire groups of people. You painting
715.
by wredue 3y ago
I strongly disagree with people who seek to suppress freedom of speech. This is not the hypocrisy that you’re painting it as. I question the motives of anyone sympathizing with Nazis as “just a different opinion” Suppressing nazism is not “
716.
by wredue 3y ago
I would say that a person claiming that it provides better results with 1/50 the effort is a claim that needs substantiation and was born from a position of hype, yes.
717.
by wredue 3y ago
As far as I can tell, you’re basing this off a single thread from a prior techempower round. The result being cleaned up in a subsequent round, but are ignoring that.
718.
by wredue 3y ago
They don’t need one. When a person makes a claim, especially such a ridiculous one, it is perfectly valid to outright reject that claim without any argument. Why? Because no argument was provided in the first place.
719.
by wredue 3y ago
Yeah. It’s not like functional programming is known for being slow, and every page adopting these ridiculous strategies has universally gotten worse and slower. Oh wait.
720.
by wredue 3y ago
I just don’t see how it could save time. Programmers nearly universally agree that reading code is harder than writing it. So when you have chat GPT writing your code, you have to read and understand it to ensure it’s actually doing what yo

More ›