wotcthrrrrow

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by wotcthrrrrow 4y ago

   That would be alarming if true, but it's a bit hard to trust the authenticity of the leak here.
2. 2.▲
   by wotcthrrrrow 4y ago

   Sure, but "not being explicit" is very different than the way OP phrased it ("WoTC says in this post") -- it made me think I'd missed some explicit mention of it. FWIW, I don't even believe they ever wanted to
3. 3.▲
   by wotcthrrrrow 4y ago

   I don't see that mentioned anywhere in this post? It even explicitly states "Content already released under 1.0a will also remain unaffected." (though ideally they'd, you know, make that legally binding.)