wombosi

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by wombosi 12y ago

   Information is not being censored. An expiration date is being put on private, irrelevant/no longer relevant information. Your failure to recognize this simple fact, does indicate two things: you either didn't read the EU ruling,
2. 2.▲
   by wombosi 12y ago

   >I personally hate Google, and avoid their products whenever possible. You took my quote out of context and ran with that. I said many HNers. Not all HNers. There is no censorship involved here. Read the EU ruling. The ruling does not pr
3. 3.▲
   by wombosi 12y ago

   The government is not censoring information. The information is still available at the source. The government is preventing Google and other search engines from permanently indexing personal irrelevant or no longer relevant information. I a
4. 4.▲
   by wombosi 12y ago

   The EU ruling is not about publishing, so your comment is a non sequitur. The EU ruling concerns Google's search index. That's something completely different.
5. 5.▲
   by wombosi 12y ago

   I find it fascinating to see the division of this topic being along seemingly national lines, i.e. European commenters seem in favor, while American commenters seem vehemently against the EU court ruling. This is somewhat of a generalizatio
6. 6.▲
   by wombosi 12y ago

   I do not get to decide the boundaries of my own privacy? Is that right? So who decides that for me? You?