Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
wolttam
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
61.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
Not always. An email has a valid SPF when its return path email’s domain permits the sending server’s IP. But that email may have a forged From: header (which causes an SPF mis-alignment), and the receiving server checks the DMARC of *the F
62.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
> smaller model that doesn't have any domain knowledge or facts built into its weights I’m not sure it works this way. Language modelling itself is a “domain”, and if it didn’t have a grasp language it wouldn’t be able to do anythin
63.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
Well, one thing it will still have is a boat-load of compute.
64.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
Each one of those employees maps to several fold times more spending on compute.
65.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
No way this can go wrong for the U.S. economy! Do everything you can to protect the existing incumbents, pay no mind to the wider consequences. Winning strategy.
66.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
The timing of this is so awfully strange. However, this U.S. centric view of the future of AI is wild. If the U.S. prevents its businesses from using open-weight models, only those businesses will suffer, while the rest of the world flouris
67.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
Would be great to see Kimi here.
68.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
I like Bash for its portability and pretty much no other reason. That one attribute of it is pretty hard to replicate with any other tool, at least over short time horizons
69.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
The U.S. model is honestly more baffling to me, if the goal is broad economic growth. But it hasn’t seemed like the U.S. powers have been interested in broad growth for quite a long time now. Just whatever can line their own pockets.
70.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
This is very cool, and the paradigm that scales to bringing truly useful robots to virtually all domains of life - just as LLMs have scaled to that degree across virtually all domains of knowledge work. I picture a lot of perfectly tended g
71.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
DeepSeek isn't the only one publishing; Kimi published about both their Attention Residuals and KDA / sparse attention.
72.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
The U.S. has ~350 million people. Anthropic and OAI can piss and moan all they want - limiting the U.S. to only their models would hurt the U.S. economy in myriad more ways than the failure of a couple of companies that scaled too quickly.
73.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
It’s 100 yuan per million output tokens in China. That’s $14.7 USD - not “far cheaper”.
74.
▲
PerceptionBench – Evaluating Atomic Visual Perception in Multimodal LLMs
(kimi.com)
2 points
by
wolttam
3mo ago
|
0 comments
75.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
Or, GLM 5.2 simply had more time in the RL oven. Deepseek V4 Flash, the 284B model, is roughly equivalent to launch GLM 5, the 744B [sic] model.
76.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
Nice, they updated it again
77.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
Mythos/Fable-class models have been around for at least 4 months internally in the US, and Kimi still isn't quite there, so I'd say the 6-months is still about right.
78.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
I know that nobody owes me anything, but I still cheer when people decide to share rather than own.
79.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
I'm so glad to be wrong!
80.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
It was on the page linked in the top comment, but it's been removed.
81.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart this one, it used to have more information about the model itself, similar to the K2.6 and K2.7 pages. Edit: OpenRouter still describes it as an open-weight m
82.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
It did say that, but it doesn't any longer.
83.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
I'm a bit nervous this one isn't going to be open-weights. Any mention of "open" has been struck from the literature for this model (it was present an hour ago). We don't even know active params? At this pricing, I&
84.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
I guess it remains to be seen whether this will be open-weights. We don't even know how many active params at this point.
85.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
I am commenting only to say that I read the reflected-letter text and found that amusing.
86.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
This wasn't the LLM, it was Grok CLI preemptively uploading the entire CWD, regardless of where that CWD is, to its own server. I don't think it is reasonable to expect every user (including those just starting out with the tools
87.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
Andrew may be a little bit grating to some (including me at times), but I value the perspectives that he brings. There is a lot of discussion about the exact tone and phrasing, etc, of Andrew's post. There's something there - we e
88.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
This is a truly underrated approach IMO
89.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
> and on-device model combination right now That would depend entirely on what your device is. This sounds likely not to be an issue with the harness, but the capabilities of the models you've tried. I experience almost no tool call
90.
▲
by
wolttam
3mo ago
It's impressive indeed. I would also expect the next checkpoint of DSv4 Flash to come in somewhere at this level (DeepSeek has had over 2 months to continue training since it released). It's exciting that the open models continue
More ›