wkjenjkwenf

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by wkjenjkwenf 6y ago

   There seems to be a lot of "there seems to be" talk in the comments. I have yet to see one comment actually calling this move a violation of the first amendment.
2. 2.▲
   by wkjenjkwenf 6y ago

   Sure, it reduced tensions on reddit , but what about tensions everywhere else? The author doesn't care about how toxic Youtube is, he cares how toxic the US is. Pushing these radicals onto radical websites only further radicalizes the
3. 3.▲
   by wkjenjkwenf 6y ago

   > "infringement of our rights." > you don't have the "right" to a spot on their platform Who are you quoting? Those words, or that sentiment, don't appear in the article. If you're quoting a comment
4. 4.▲
   by wkjenjkwenf 6y ago

   Not a single word in the article hints towards the 1st amendment. I suggest reading the article before acting all high-and-mighty about your "common sense."