Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
willemt
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
2 ms
·
1.
▲
by
willemt
11y ago
Nothing like active-standby or active-active at the moment. When Raft gets added in the future it'll have active-active at the cost of read and write performance.
2.
▲
by
willemt
11y ago
PearlDB doesn't manage replication yet. There are plans to use Raft to get a cluster that is linearisable. Right now you can put multiple Varnish nodes in front of one PearlDB node, and you'll get an eventually consistent database
3.
▲
by
willemt
11y ago
The number one differentiator is the small size of the source code. If all you need is a key value server that does GET and PUT, then 1k lines would be easier to understand than +10k. The focus is on doing one thing and doing it well. Compa
4.
▲
Show HN: PearlDB = LMDB and H2O. REST key-value database server in C
(github.com)
6 points
by
willemt
11y ago
|
6 comments