wilg

37 ms·

781.
by wilg 3y ago
Ridiculous. It’s evil because it robs the citizens of agency and power, puts arbitrary offspring into absolute power, and creates a caste system.
782.
by wilg 3y ago
I do too. Not the worst kind of oppression though, by far.
783.
by wilg 3y ago
You are intentionally ignoring my point about how the symbolic nature itself is evil. It is unconscionable to have a monarchy as a symbol of a country! A monarchy is an affront to human decency; it's absurd. And I do not agree with you
784.
by wilg 3y ago
As I said, the symbol itself is evil. But it seems you agree Royal Assent is legally required. It's a monarchy. Don't gaslight people into thinking it isn't.
785.
by wilg 3y ago
OK, but doesn't make it fruitful to treat the symptom instead of the disease.
786.
by wilg 3y ago
I agree. Having a hereditary monarch is evil. It's that simple. Doesn't matter if it's "symbolic", it's an evil symbol of oppression. Also, it's not symbolic. The king has to approve all laws, for example.
787.
by wilg 3y ago
goofy
788.
by wilg 3y ago
You must be talking about something else. Most companies reserve a day a month or something where people have a little hackathon. They still get paid for it and it takes place during business hours.
789.
by wilg 3y ago
If hack days are screwing up scheduling, that's a scheduling problem. (You'll have to figure that out with your company.) If hack days are used to prototype work that's definitely going to be done anyway, that's a planni
790.
by wilg 3y ago
GitHub Desktop does this very well. Highly recommend!
791.
by wilg 3y ago
Seems like a misreading of the law. [It just means the copyright goes to the person who generated the AI image and that is the current working situation for AI copyright in the US.] [EDIT: WRONG] And the information about Steam banning AI i
792.
by wilg 3y ago
I agree there are better arguments. My point was that the specific argument I was replying to was bad.
793.
by wilg 3y ago
Unrelated gibberish
794.
by wilg 3y ago
No because it's not a problem for things to be heavy.
795.
by wilg 3y ago
Yeah about twice as much. But it's still a bad argument because pounds don't really matter.
796.
by wilg 3y ago
I didn't do that.
797.
by wilg 3y ago
Both of those are included and mentioned in the linked article.
798.
by wilg 3y ago
This is a terrible argument against cars. You could say the same for a train, let's waste energy carrying around 1,500,000 pounds of train to move around 120,000 pounds of passengers.
799.
by wilg 3y ago
It doesn't really matter, because if this is possible then it will not be exclusive to OpenAI for long. It's simply just something that can exist. There will be open source versions of everything lagging 1-2 years behind or someth
800.
by wilg 3y ago
I think it's just inherent to the problem space. Obviously it understands something about the world to be able to generate convincing depictions of it.
801.
by wilg 3y ago
No, it's America's fault.
802.
by wilg 3y ago
What's "the requisite defence"?
803.
by wilg 3y ago
You wait a year and they'll figure it out.
804.
by wilg 3y ago
I do and that's wrong.
805.
by wilg 3y ago
Absolutely, advertisers are big companies who don't really care how much they're spending on ads. Especially big brands, they have no idea how much advertising helps them, and they don't care about the budget that much. They&
806.
by wilg 3y ago
I agree, but of course national legislation is like impossible now due to a certain obstructionist political party.
807.
by wilg 3y ago
Man Mercedes has a killer marketing team
808.
by wilg 3y ago
Is this just a complicated way of explaining that you don't understand or care what a monopoly is?
809.
by wilg 3y ago
Well a monopoly is famously not the same thing as a large company.
810.
by wilg 3y ago
Why does this matter when you can buy other computers that allow you to install whatever software you want? Why do all computers have to work the way you want instead of you just purchasing ones that have the features you want?

More ›