wilg

24 ms·

421.
by wilg 1y ago
What if you want to make a game and then a movie based on that game?
422.
by wilg 1y ago
The commercialization of it? It's a AAA video game, it was commercial from the jump! All they did is made a well-received HBO show out of it.
423.
by wilg 1y ago
> They might lose money. I expect it's more about them losing the _case_. Silly to expect someone fighting a lawsuit not to try to win it.
424.
by wilg 1y ago
Yes I think Musk is personally responsible for the cuts he did as part of the thing he loudly and proudly claimed to be in charge of, enabled by the president he claims to have gotten elected. I’m not sure why you’re so easy to write off 10
425.
by wilg 1y ago
Yeah I’m hoping the R2 is an option but FSD has become very critical. I don’t see how Tesla could even dissociate with him, he owns the board and would have to divest also. I think the only path back is if people forget, conservatives sudde
426.
by wilg 1y ago
Rivian seems fine and makes the second best EVs. But also it’s not hyperbole, though I agree it sounds like it. Association comes in different strengths and forms. But currently owned and operated by a guy actively destroying my country is
427.
by wilg 1y ago
That logic is the conventional wisdom, but I just want to know whether it's true empirically.
428.
by wilg 1y ago
I recently started using Duolingo and it seems pretty good.
429.
by wilg 1y ago
I love the brass of putting "Our Incredible Journey" posts on blast right up top and then writing a post that even less clearly explains if they are shutting down entirely, why they are doing so, or what is going on.
430.
by wilg 1y ago
but it can perform all kinds of tasks. generally intelligent isn't universally intelligent, is it?
431.
by wilg 1y ago
a question, especially this one, can't really be "not even wrong"
432.
by wilg 1y ago
but OP didn't give the AI a week it gave it less than a minute
433.
by wilg 1y ago
defining what you mean is absolutely a prerequisite to someone else being able to figure out if you are right
434.
by wilg 1y ago
Is there any evidence to suggest more people are cheating now that there is AI than before, or is everybody just flipping out because the cheaters have changed tactics?
435.
by wilg 1y ago
> But look at what people actually use this wonder for: brain-dead books and videos, scam-filled ads, polished but boring homework essays. Another presenter at the workshop I attended said he used AI to help him decide what to give his k
436.
by wilg 1y ago
its certainly currently useful and also generally intelligent, right?
437.
by wilg 1y ago
to answer that you have to define AGI first
438.
by wilg 1y ago
If you don't trust the company your opt-out strategy is much easier, you simply do not authorize them to access your code.
439.
by wilg 1y ago
o3 since it can web search while reasoning is a really useful lighter weight deep research
440.
by wilg 2y ago
Think about it this way, if the richest person in the world wanted something done, they would probably just shoot off a text to someone, maybe answer a few questions, and then some time later it would be done. That's your interface.
441.
by wilg 2y ago
The terms of the license don’t require you to modify the git history that’s a goofy interpretation.
442.
by wilg 2y ago
No, I'm saying they should be much clearer about what their definition is. I also suggested a way to use implement their same "authentic and notable" definition via a trusted and democratic third-party like Wikipedia.
443.
by wilg 2y ago
It seems like the main problem with verification is that everyone is conflating what verification is or is supposed to be. It doesn't mean "this person is trustworthy" it means "this person is who they claim to be".
444.
by wilg 2y ago
What if there aren't any or they have not yet done that because they wanted to respond to this person first?
445.
by wilg 2y ago
They should neither rewrite the commits nor take the old packages offline. It's not worth a huge potential clusterfuck when the issue has been fixed on the latest version.
446.
by wilg 2y ago
Very silly, they can't rewrite the commit history nor would it be proper to update old packaged releases.
447.
by wilg 2y ago
I mean what else are they supposed to say or do to correct a mistake other than "sorry, here's what happened, we have fixed it, we are taking steps to reduce the chances of it happening again"? Sometimes you just have to corr
448.
by wilg 2y ago
Deploying several things is sometimes tricky and this could not be a smaller deal.
449.
by wilg 2y ago
> We expect to release OpenAI o3‑pro in a few weeks with full tool support. For now, Pro users can still access o1‑pro. https://openai.com/index/introducing-o3-and-o4-mini/
450.
by wilg 2y ago
They are all now available on the Pro plan. Y'all really ought to have a little bit more grace to wait 30 minutes after the announcement for the rollout.

More ›