3 ms·

to answer that you have to define AGI first

• swiftcoder 1y ago
  That's not a prerequisite to refute a position, no. The ball is in the other court - if one is working on AGI, it behooves one to know what one is aiming at (and I'd stake a fair wager that OpenAI et al have at this moment very little better picture of what AGI looks like than you or I)
  • wilg 1y ago
    defining what you mean is absolutely a prerequisite to someone else being able to figure out if you are right
    • swiftcoder 1y ago
      To some extent, yes, but the onus here is on the party making wildly unverifiable claims, not the party refuting them