wilg

17 ms·

391.
by wilg 1y ago
No, it's subjective because there is no right and wrong. The business goals themselves are subjective. There is no right answer to whether you should build an operating system. Very related to https://en.wikipedia.org/w
392.
by wilg 1y ago
Maybe. Is it a public or a private school? Is this something they could or should have reasonably known? What is their duty to accommodate you? Is OP accurately describing the situation? Let's say they let you fill it out with pen and
393.
by wilg 1y ago
Because it's a judgement call about how you weigh and weight various factors, it's inherently subjective.
394.
by wilg 1y ago
It's the government's role to serve everyone generally, so they should provide reasonable accommodations for people. I suspect there are such accommodations, but it's hard to say without looking at a specific, real scenario.
395.
by wilg 1y ago
I don't think its unreasonable for private companies not to bother to offer their services to these people. Why should they have to? Many services require nearby physical infrastructure. Electing to live in the woods is not really a di
396.
by wilg 1y ago
It is very much not an objective discussion if you are discussing whether it makes sense to develop a new operating system.
397.
by wilg 1y ago
Doesn't sound like a very useful definition!
398.
by wilg 1y ago
Worked for me: https://chatgpt.com/share/689bc3ef-fa1c-800f-9275-93c2dbc11b...
399.
by wilg 1y ago
Think how many JavaScript frameworks can be vibe coded now!
400.
by wilg 1y ago
o3 cannot use its own table formatting to save its life
401.
by wilg 1y ago
Every OpenAI announcement has threads of people complaining that the links don't work yet as if you can trivially deploy 10 different interconnected websites completely instantly.
402.
by wilg 1y ago
It's not a coincidence or a cartel, it's PR counterprogramming.
403.
by wilg 1y ago
I don't see how. You are engaging in a discussion about what is generally happening, meaning aggregating data is required. If you want to have a conversation about specific people, then yes, you can find some young renter that is havin
404.
by wilg 1y ago
Of course it's an average, again, that's the point. Thats how you make generalizations about what's going on.
405.
by wilg 1y ago
CPI inflation adjustment accounts for this, that's the purpose of it. You're trying to bend the data to your pre-existing beliefs.
406.
by wilg 1y ago
I said that they aren't ads. Seems like we agree.
407.
by wilg 1y ago
GDPR has plenty of language related to reasonability, cost, feasibility, and technical state of the art that probably means LLM providers do not have to comply in the same way, say, a social platform might.
408.
by wilg 1y ago
There are no ads in that post, the guy is confused. Those are the search results he asked for.
409.
by wilg 1y ago
On a recent episode of Dithering, Ben Thompson's claim is this is downstream of an effort to make acquisitions of small companies more difficult, and that this is worse than the previous regulatory status quo: https://dither
410.
by wilg 1y ago
LinkedIn is probably the only social platform that would be improved by bots.
411.
by wilg 1y ago
Can they include a dead man's switch so they become unusable one day later?
412.
by wilg 1y ago
Who pays for that server's continued availability?
413.
by wilg 1y ago
In many cases, this means you would have to design the server significantly differently as you may use proprietary first or third-party technology in your server that you cannot redistribute.
414.
by wilg 1y ago
> Put an expiration date on the storefront and make it clear that your software is not guaranteed to continue working after date X. Why wouldn't everyone just say "its not guaranteed to continue working after 0 seconds from rel
415.
by wilg 1y ago
No it isn't. People buy movie tickets, annual passes, and other things all the time that are not "rented". These are things you buy, and you may lose access to them if something happens to the business. The terms of the purch
416.
by wilg 1y ago
But you’re not renting or subscribing to it so that is inaccurate and confusing for a one time upfront payment business model.
417.
by wilg 1y ago
Why bother? If consumers care they will just prefer games that don’t have this issue and games that might die will be taxed implicitly. It would probably very often be worth it to just pay the tax for any of the big games people care about
418.
by wilg 1y ago
Do the binaries have to be usable forever? Or for how long? What if some system update breaks them?
419.
by wilg 1y ago
It seems like it should be legal for your end of life plan for the game to be “it is over and no one gets to play it anymore”.
420.
by wilg 1y ago
This seems very silly to me. Why would it apply only to games? It specifically is trying to apply to free games also. Should any product or service you ship with a client have to allow you to self host it if you don’t want to support it for

More ›