Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
wildfire
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
91.
▲
by
wildfire
8y ago
Why is this even a story? When has agressive sales tactics gone well for a company?
92.
▲
by
wildfire
8y ago
If this would "seriously mess up the stats", then arguably the CDN is doing it wrong. It should bill on the inner (encrypted) domain and not what is outside.
93.
▲
by
wildfire
9y ago
> A simple homework assignment will do much of the same and allow them to do it at their own pace and having full access to any tool, instead of during some arbitrary time limit with someone else breathing down their neck. Who is paying
94.
▲
by
wildfire
9y ago
Not true. Terraform v0.9 only handles remote state and locking properly. Handling multiple applies of state is something scheduled for 0.10 Basically terragrunt handles some stuff today in a less robust, less portable, way that your team is
95.
▲
by
wildfire
10y ago
You do realise that the argument that that site is presenting is false. Firstly: "With TLS properly configured, DNSSEC adds nothing." DNSSEC presents you with a valid, secure chain to know that the meta-data (encoded as TLSA) ab
96.
▲
by
wildfire
10y ago
Something that is isn't really discussed is that the need for base64 arose so that binary data could transit 7-bit email systems. Base122 does not have that property - as far as I could tell. Whilst we are all, basically, living in an
97.
▲
by
wildfire
10y ago
I'm both European and Australian. I have cards in both countries with Chip-only, Chip+NFC, and (still!) two stripe only. In Australia, you can activate the card terminal by inserting it, swiping it or tapping it. There is no difference
98.
▲
by
wildfire
10y ago
There are a whole bunch already! http://www.faqs.org/faqs/internet-services/access-via-email/ Probably worth some karma to update this 14 year old document too.
99.
▲
by
wildfire
10y ago
"enterprisey". Perhaps I'm in the minority but I have actually setup my home system to use SSO (backed via LDAP). It annoys me no end that all these services seem to think that charging to maintain my userbase is a way to get
100.
▲
by
wildfire
10y ago
Apart from Jetbrains, I've used all the other tools you mention. In no way, shape or form would I sayd that Bamboo is good. It is not any more sufferable than Jenkins. Even Jenkins now alows the build / deploy pipeline to be somet
101.
▲
by
wildfire
10y ago
Because the feature is large? Or the developer acted normally and split thing into multiple, small, independant commits? If the submittor then takes a lot of time between comments and performing changes, is the commentor to blame for a PR b
102.
▲
by
wildfire
11y ago
Wow. Thanks for bringing back visions of the 1990s. These arguments were tiresome then; they are boring now. You are conflating GNU, GPL and LGPL. The GNU system may never be as successful as you think. But portions like The GNU Compiler Co
103.
▲
by
wildfire
12y ago
Yes, we need proof. You've asserted many things. But with no links to any proof. Every question you asked above, also applies to the US. I'm not going to bother providing links until you do.
104.
▲
by
wildfire
12y ago
FYI - The complaint is regarding the VMWare ESXi kernel.
105.
▲
by
wildfire
12y ago
> I've talked to a few lawyers and they basically > consider GPLv3 a contract that isn't worth bothering with. Presumably they gave you a reason, along with a sizeable bill? You seem to have misunderstood the intent of the
106.
▲
by
wildfire
12y ago
> It absolutely ignores that Apple was a contributor of GCC Actually, Apple were compelled to contribute to GCC. That is one of the points of the article. That an Objective-C compiler exists at all is because of GCC. The fact that
107.
▲
by
wildfire
12y ago
www.seafile.com is another
108.
▲
by
wildfire
12y ago
I'm old enough to remember to spell, and remember when the first Mac came out. The response has always been the same; one segment pointing out problems, another pointing out how "visionary" the new thing is. If you are as old
109.
▲
by
wildfire
13y ago
Well, please argue it then. Please provide evidence that it – deployment – failed, not that it is hard to understand (69 pages of training books and multi-day training courses are understanding issues, not deployment). I mean, it became pos
110.
▲
by
wildfire
13y ago
A shame. Whilst I am always intrigued with what hits the front-page, I rather more often than occasionally, find myself getting to page 10 or so on the weekends. Just to see what has been going on that I missed. Your change will basically m
111.
▲
by
wildfire
13y ago
Yes. Totally true. IF you are a developer. How many managers do you meet who still contribute to Free Software? Or who even look at Stackoverflow, let alone contribute. You might, which might make you exceptional but the vast majority of
112.
▲
by
wildfire
13y ago
Ah, yes, that whole gov.uk thing. I must have dreamed it then. And so must have the 180+ people hired to work on various parts of it who are not part of EDS, IBM and BT.
113.
▲
by
wildfire
13y ago
Hi Brian, Your cancellation policy, as well as others are not balanced on either side. I'm a host -- and I've been a guest. Once. As a host, I get to choose the verification level I will accept; as a guest, I'm basically forc
114.
▲
by
wildfire
13y ago
Please point me to a copy of this "Unix philosphy" you speak of. You can't, because there isn't one. If you were at the talk yesterday, like I was, and actually listened to what they said they explained why they chose to
115.
▲
by
wildfire
13y ago
I think you mean, they've spent years compensating for assuming that everyone would implement the RFCs similarly. I'm not aware of RFC breakage, do you have any pointers?
116.
▲
by
wildfire
13y ago
How do you know? Was it in click-through agreement when signing up?
117.
▲
by
wildfire
13y ago
You present a number of licence choices but I think what you really need to consider is who you believe your potential competitors are. Are they (small) consultants / consultanties who are likely to install your system for other to use
118.
▲
by
wildfire
13y ago
> All forms of EFT take 1-2 business days between banks, > pretty much all the time; and they're universally free for > the payer. Other people have already weighed in on the fact that actually not all of the payment systems
119.
▲
by
wildfire
13y ago
Actually EFT does have fees. Typically between 10c - 25c / transaction. They are minimal, but they are there. Plus the fee for the terminal of course. Which varies significantly between banks in AU.
120.
▲
by
wildfire
13y ago
You do realise that 'mobile' now accounts for > 50% of pageviews? Which means that your ad vendors actually about HTML5 support. They just do not know it yet.
More ›